Find the perfect editor for your next book

1 million authors trust the professionals on Reedsy, come meet them.

Reedsy Professionals

Last updated on Jul 21, 2021

Third Person Omniscient: The All-Seeing Eye (With Examples)

Third person omniscient is the point of view where the narrator takes a "God's Eye View," freely relating the thoughts of any character and any part of the backstory. The word literally means “all-knowing,” so third-person omniscient narrators are not usually active characters in the story but have an external narrative voice. For example:

Arjun didn’t know what lay behind the screen door: a 70lb Dobermann, asleep and dreaming of chasing a train.

Third person omniscient is probably the oldest narrative form of recorded storytelling. Tales of Odin, Heracles, and Amun-Ra would have been told by bards around the fire, with what we’d consider an omniscient narrator. There are no limits to what the narrator may tell the reader — though, compared to more intimate perspectives, you may need to work harder to ensure that your book remains enjoyable to modern readers.

D4wWgWsSCus Video Thumb

This viewpoint has recently fallen out of favor with agents and publishers, as it creates less intimacy with the reader than limited third or first-person POVs and often leads to “head-hopping.”

The power of third person omniscient

Omniscience can be a thrilling experience for readers, and third person narratives furnish this knowledge with a distance that comes with some cool perks. Let’s look at what makes this point of view so powerful.

It can conduct multiple character studies

The power of omniscience is such that the narrator can slip into the minds of several characters, simultaneously or in turn. This gives the author plenty of room to experiment with the pacing of the story and presents a unique opportunity to delve into the psychology of multiple characters.

In this passage from Annie Proulx’s "Brokeback Mountain," we are privy to two separate, private moments of longing.

Third Person Omniscient Example | A passage from brokeback mountainThe fact that, unbeknownst to each other, both Ennis and Jack look for each other during the day, demonstrates how they are present in each other’s thoughts. With this brilliant example of show, don’t tell, we can see the strength of their connection in its quietest, most private expressions. This particular moment is not possible with any other type of viewpoint.

Create an unfettered narrator voice

Writing with an omniscient narrator allows the author to create a persona of sorts, who sits outside the story's world. These narrators aren’t technically characters, but their narration will be distinctive from the voices of characters inside the story.

Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams both wrote using omniscient narrators. The tone they adopted in the Discworld and Hitchhiker’s Guide novels could be likened to that of a historian, relating details of their worlds using narrative asides. Pratchett’s narrator even uses footnotes like you would see in a non-fiction book, often to sneak in extra jokes.

In this passage from a Discworld novel, Pratchett goes on a tangent about the Bursar of the wizarding university:

third person omniscient example | A passage from Reaper Man by Terry Pratchett

These details are completely incidental and would almost certainly never make it into the final draft of a book written from limited or first person POVs. Pratchett’s omniscient narrator is not unreliable and can comment heavily on the events and characters of his books.

Play with dramatic irony

Because the omniscient narrator can know something that the viewpoint characters do not, it allows the author to use dramatic irony in their story. That is where the reader knows something that the main characters do not.

For example, in the early books of A Series of Unfortunate Events, the (fictional) author Lemony Snicket acts as an omniscient narrator. He chronicles the misfortunes of the orphaned Baudelaire children as they attempt to uncover their family secrets. At many points in each book, this narrator reminds the reader that even worse things are to come for our heroes.

Third Person Omniscient ExampleEven though Snicket often slips into the first person and directly addresses the reader, he is very much an omniscient narrator. He knows what has happened before the story and what is to come — and is gleefully playing with the reader’s desire to unravel the mystery.

Give your story the “cinematic treatment”

Of course, what we’re talking about here will predate the language of cinema, but for the sake of simplicity, imagine an omniscient narrator working like a film director. They may start a scene with a wide establishing shot that shows the environment before tracking in and focusing on specific characters. This is from the opening chapter of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings series':

third person omniscient example | Lord of the Rings

Tolkien starts this passage with his ‘wide shot,’ establishing the hubbub rippling through the Shire. He then zooms into a pub, and in particular, to an old Hobbit about to recount his personal tales of Bilbo. This ability to move swiftly between the small and big picture is harder to pull off with a limited POV. It’s also easier to quickly switch between various story strands — bearing in mind that doing this too often will make it harder for readers to latch onto any one of the plots or characters.

The option of cold, objective detachment

Many new writers are led to believe that third person omniscient is an inherently ‘objective’ point of view. It’s not — just see Lemony Snicket above!. The way a narrator frames the story and describes characters and their actions will almost always suggest some level of subjectivity. But that’s not to say that an author can’t use ‘objectivity’ as a device in their writing.

In this opening passage from Shirley Jackson’s most famous short story, her narrator takes a detached, fly-on-the-wall approach:

Third Person Omniscient Example | The Lottery by Shirley Jackson

There’s a matter-of-fact tone that weaves its way through Jackson’s narration. This section almost entirely focuses on the logistics of running this mysterious lottery — which itself is introduced in an almost incidental way. We have taken the narrator's viewpoint, observing these events from a distance. In the final passages of the story, when we (spoiler alert) discover that the ‘winners’ of these lotteries get stoned to death, the brutality of this ritual is made even more harrowing by the narrator’s emotional detachment.

Sign up for our free POV writing course

Learn to write in first, third, and even second-person point of view with our free 10-day course. Get started now.

Common mistakes when writing in third person omniscient

Third person omniscient is a viewpoint where the narrator can say just about anything. However, there are certain pitfalls that authors should avoid if they want to ensure an enjoyable reading experience.

Too many flashbacks, asides, and lectures

Critics of Tolkien often point to his tendency to break away from the action of his main story to deliver lectures on the history of Middle Earth. Doing this allows him to expand the scope of the world he’s built, but the danger of doing this is that it can break up the book's momentum, slow down the action, and turn your readers off.

Tipping your hand too early (by hinting at twists)

While an omniscient narrator may wish to foreshadow crucial plot points to deepen the payoff, they should be careful not to over-egg it. After all, modern readers are particularly tuned-in to story conventions: if you show a character loading a gun in your opening chapters, many readers will understand that someone’s going to get shot.

Without the ‘filter’ of a viewpoint character, the reader might assume that anything an omniscient narrator draws attention to (like a loaded gun) will be important to the story.

third person omniscient tips | chekhov's gun
Ah, Chekhov and his gun...

With a limited third person or first person narrative, the viewpoint character can observe a gun being loaded through their personal filter. Maybe they’re ex-military, and they’re admiring the weapon from a professional perspective. Perhaps it reminds them of hunting with their dad. In these cases, a plot clue can be more easily disguised as a character detail.

Speaking of unexpected developments: if you need some inspiration, check out our list of 70+ plot twist ideas.

Telling, not showing

Again, another downside to third person omniscient’s seeming lack of rules is that it can often encourage writers to revert to bad habits. In this case, we’re talking about creative writing’s golden rule: show, don’t tell.

Sure, your narrator could just tell the reader something about a character:

Prathima suffered from a fear of heights.

But it's always more satisfying for a reader to be shown this part of her personality. It doesn’t take much to write in a quick piece of action that shows Prathima deliberately hugging the wall when descending an emergency staircase or looking up at the Empire State Building and feeling a knot in her stomach.

So, always remember the basics of good writing — even when you aren’t held to account by any formal writing rules.

Murder at Reedsy Manor: An Omniscient Mystery

In our previous post on the third person limited point of view, we shared a comic strip showing that particular viewpoint in action. To round out this post on omniscient narrators, let us return to that fateful evening at Reedsy Manor.

third person omniscient mystery


Now that we've wrapped up our pitstop of third-person viewpoints, let's finish off our POV grand tour by looking at what happens when you have multiple viewpoint characters.  

11 responses

Jennie says:

15/05/2019 – 22:45

I have been using an omniscient third person POV because that’s what I enjoy reading, I suppose, and because it lets me impart the information I want to impart. I’ve just received some feedback that I should tighten that perspective—code for limiting the POV, I suppose—and now I’m on the fence. The constant tension between making the art that I believe in and making the art that might get published and thus have the chance to be seen is distracting, compounded by the conflicting messages of lit mag publishers, “Be brave! Be bold! Be new! But please do it within these narrow confines dictated by current fashion.” Sigh...

↪️ Raya Moon replied:

31/10/2019 – 13:16

I love that last comment. It definitely seems to be the case which makes getting published that much harder. Maybe that's why I dread ever starting the process.

↪️ Khan Wong replied:

30/01/2020 – 04:35

In the same boat!

Tiffany says:

12/07/2019 – 19:50

Say I’m writing a novel in third person and i only sometimes needed someone else’s POV, but only rarely, would i use Multiple third person limited or omniscient? Or would it be better to write in first person POV and separate those chapters/moments it’s writing their name in bold lettering to separate it like Stephanie Meyers did in Breaking Dawn? Like i only need the other POV once or twice in the whole series I’m writing.

↪️ Martin Cavannagh replied:

16/07/2019 – 08:47

In cases like this, the key is to let the reader know as soon as possible that they're not following the same POV character. You might do that with chapter headings as you say, but you can also heavily suggest it with the language. If it's in the first person, use the "I" pronoun quite heavily at the start of the chapter and the reader will immediately wonder whose POV this is... then as soon as they figure it out, it'll all click for them. Then the next time you switch back to First Person mode, their assumption is that it will be the same character.

JoML says:

08/08/2019 – 05:45

I've just joined a writers group and have been told I'm switching POV in a short story. The founder says in one of her articles that third person POV should be written in that character's style of speech, thought etc. It got me wondering, what happens to the actual narrator in third person limited? Eg I start with a bird's eye view of the ocean, surfers etc and zoom in to one single surfer, who is the main character. I'm not going to write that first scene in her voice. That seems ridiculous. Is there a possibility that writers can become so fixated on this that they forget there's always a narrator, no matter how invisible? I also want the reader to see this girl through the father's eyes at one point, but I'm being forced to edit this out unless I commit to third person omniscient. I've been writing for a long time and only just learning the technicalities, so could have got this all wrong.

↪️ Yvonne replied:

10/08/2019 – 04:17

Your writer's group may be correct here. Third person limited is restricted to one character's thoughts and feelings. A third person omniscient narrator is the only narrator who can "see" everything and access everyone's perspectives at any given point in time — so yes, in your example of a father and his daughter, it sounds like you're exercising the use of a third person omniscient narrator. (That said, multiple third person limited POV is an option, as we mentioned above.) This post with 70+ examples of POV may be useful in helping you distinguish between each of them: https://blog.reedsy.com/guide/point-of-view/. And if you'd like more clarification, feel free to email service@reedsy.com to discuss further! :)

Na says:

01/09/2019 – 00:14

Thankyou. A very informative post and I’ve been guilty of accidentally head hopping in one chapter while moving to a Martinesque multiple 3plo after this chapter. Back to the drawing board it is then for some edits...

Raya Moon says:

31/10/2019 – 13:14

I've mostly used First Person until recently, hence me looking up this article. Thanks to this I understand very vividly where i went wrong in my recent work. Mostly the head hopping issue. I wasn't sure where to go with the POV so it ended up being something of both omniscient and limited at the same time, which if it would ever be taken seriously, might be kind of funny to see work out. I liked how it was working, but others seemed thrown by it. Guess I should rectify it some. I might do two, one with each and see which way works better, but I think I will probably stick to limited, being it's closer to what I am familiar with. If anyone has seen both in a story and thinks it could work, let me know.

Cererean says:

18/01/2020 – 15:48

Given that Pratchett, Adams, and Snicket used (and in the latter case, uses) third person omniscient, it can't have been that long ago that publishers got funny about it...

Sasha Anderson says:

31/05/2020 – 11:41

I still don't really understand what "head-hopping" is. On various different advice sites, I've seen the phrase refer to anything from "having more than one person's point of view in a chapter" to "switching point of view in a way that's jarring to the reader".I can see that in a third person limited perspective, you don't want to throw in a random sentence from someone else's point of view, but in the section on omniscient point of view you say "Within a given scene, avoid filtering the action through more than one character." If you're only changing viewpoint at a scene break, isn't that just third person limited with multiple viewpoint characters? I thought the point of omniscient was that you could be in any character's head you want, as long as you do it in a way that works for the reader.Guess I still have lots to learn...

Comments are currently closed.