Future History.
I was there. I saw how little weight the professor’s opinions carried against the institutional forces that make the decisions. I needed no further convincing on the futility of his protests.
“I hate to bore you all with the same set of facts again,” the professor began, “but the problem with this project, is that the theory predicts a second singularity, of unknown coordinates, somewhere outside the facility. Which means it could pop up anywhere.”
“We’re all aware of that professor.”
“And this committee finds such a possibility acceptable?”
The Chairman replied on behalf of the assembly, “It’s a very small event in a very big universe, professor. The odds of anything—like that, appearing anywhere near the earth, or even in this solar system, are so astronomically high, that it damn near fried a few CPU’s in the process of doing the calculations. Your devotion to caution is admirable professor, but a little misguided here, we think.”
March 30, 2001
Milton Hagenbechner pronounced his name while watching his lips move in the bathroom mirror. It was a mouthful. He was in the washroom fastening the last button on his shirt when his stomach lurched. It felt like the entire house bounced. A distortion in the mirror was gone before his mind could register the image, but it imparted a subliminal dread. He waited, half expecting some further consequence: the sound of tinkling glass, or wood cracking or groaning. Instead, the bounce was followed by an uncanny continuity of normal sounds. A house full of people waking up, water running; cupboards closing; toilets flushing.
He accepted a kiss from his mom, hugged his dog, stuffed the sandwich and orange into his backpack with his books, swung it over his shoulder, and stepped out into a moist and frigid Florida morning. A short walk brought him to the bus stop, which left him standing with three other kids in the pre-dawn fog.
Danny, the tallest of the other kids said, “Anybody else feel that earthquake this morning?”
One of the shorter boys said, “We don’t get earthquakes in Florida, dork.”
“I felt it, Danny.”
This was the first time Milton had spoken to any of them. He was still new to the area, and shy.
Danny nodded, and said, “I wasn’t sure if I was imagining it, or what, ‘cuz…”
“Oh, it was real.” Milton said.
The bus arrived, the doors opened, and the kids lined up with Milton bringing up the rear. Something tugged at him from behind. He attempted to spin around, but whoever it was had a firm grip on his backpack so he adroitly slipped out of the shoulder straps and turned to face the troublemaker.
A black ball, the size of a dinner plate, hung in the air at the same approximate height of his own head, about five-feet above the ground. It had a hold of Milton’s backpack. He tried to pull it free but doing so only seemed to produce more resistance.
Frightened at first, but curious, he sensed that the thing was just a thing: Not aware, or hostile, or even intelligent.
The autonomous bus beeped a departure warning, the sun cleared the horizon and the object was illuminated by the first rays of dawn. It looked like the light—went right down into it. Forever. He reached for the pocket containing his sandwich and regretted it the next instant. The slight increase in mass to the proximity of the object, multiplied by infinity, felt like an invisible force that grabbed Milton’s hand and would not let it go.
The bus beeped a second departure warning. He heard Danny’s voice yelling for him to ‘Leave that thing alone.’ ‘Thanks for the advice’ he felt like saying, as he struggled to pull himself away, shoes scuffing at the ground frantically. He screamed for help, desperate at last, but was drowned out by the bus’s warning beep, the doors closing and the sound of the engine. He was left with the image of Danny’s anguished face through the side window as the bus lumbered away; leaving the helpless boy struggling to escape what looked like the grasp of his own backpack.
January 24, 2023
“Did you hear? I won approval for the project.” It was the ‘brash, young researcher’ the professor had warned me about.
I watched as the professor allowed the paper he was reading to drop to the desk. “Yes sir, I heard, and I don’t like it.”
His young colleague cheerfully assured him that whether he liked it or not, he would most likely find good use for all the quarks and muons the research would generate.
“Is that some kind of joke?” The professor said. “I’m sorry, I just don’t feel like there’s much room for humor in particle physics.”
“No, I’ll grant you that, professor, but there’s still plenty of room for hard research, and, if I may speak plainly, the collider’s just sitting there, doing nothing.”
The professor was irritated, at what, I didn’t know. He said something like, ah, “There’s a ton of atomic bombs laying around doing nothing. You want to play around with some of them too? See what happens?” This drew no response from the buoyant young physicist.
After his younger counterpart had gone, the professor stewed for a while, sifting through stacks of old file folders. Considering his retirement, perhaps. When he had calmed down a bit, he wanted to talk about it and I was a convenient ear. Of course, I’m merely a technical writer and what transpired in their personal affairs did not belong in the paper I was researching, and that’s why I’m putting it all down here.
What the professor said next was, “Do you know what a collimator is?”
I had heard the term, but was forced to admit, I did not know what it was.
“It’s a device that helps keep a particle beam focused.”
“And?”
“Every physicist and engineer will swear that these things, (he gestured at the door you went through to physically inspect the cyclotron), these things are useless without them.”
“And that’s not true?” I asked.
“The problem is, it’s not false.” He opened a lower cabinet drawer and retrieved a bottle and a tumbler and set them on the desk. “Would you care for a drink?
I had a feeling I was going to need one. “Sure,” I said. “Just a splash.” He poured one, I tossed it down, and it felt like I’d swallowed a comet.
“You know all about this facility,” he said, “I gave you the tour myself, you’ve seen the technology, the complexity, my God, the sheer size of it, a circular tunnel 17 miles in diameter.”
He was referring to the LHC. Of course. The Large Hadron Collider: A marvel of modern technology and a spectacular piece of scientific ingenuity, also the subject of my paper. Considering how boring that paper was going to be, I was intrigued at the prospect of some alcohol induced candor about professional backstabbing.
“Tell me more,” I said.
After he poured both of us another drink, he went on to explain that the problem with quantum physics and the attempt to create an artificial singularity, was that it predicted a duplicate, matching, or twin singularity, somewhere else in space. A small, temporary black hole at the other end of a wormhole. Quantum calculations required it.
I think we all understood as much, by this time. But he went on to explain a little-known event in the collider’s history, which I can relate in his own words because I recorded it. It goes like this: “When it was freshly built and new, the engineers needed to run some tests to help calibrate and tune the huge machine. But they hadn’t installed the collimators yet. The Hadron collider can create streams of particles going in both directions, but without the collimators, there was so much sub-atomic distance between the individual particles of both streams, that the chance of a collision was effectively nil. That’s what they all said. It was the only thing that the engineers and the physicists agreed on. And you can quote me on that, they agreed on nothing else. But they both knew that there was no chance of a particle collision. Without collimators, those particles were like two handfuls of peas thrown at each other from opposite ends of the solar system.”
The professor poured himself a third drink and leaned back in his chair. “And yet, they fired up this here collider, this one right here behind me, sent two swarms of particles in opposite directions, and to prove that there would be no collisions, one of the engineers put a detector in the tank as a practical joke. They can only be used once and they damn near fired him for wasting one, but when they finished the test, lo and behold, it recorded not one collision, but two: With no collimators.”
I looked it up later, it was a factual account.
“The universe is opportunistic,” he said. “It makes things happen.”
March 30, 2001.
The thought that he might die never occurred to Milton at the time. As the bus drove away, he was sure that at least one of the kids knew he was in trouble. How that might help, he wasn’t sure. When you’re eleven years old, there’s not much life to flash by in those final seconds, and as the futility of his predicament settled over him, he grew calm, still, and studied the thing from an arm’s length away. His hand was still about nine inches away from the object, and uncompressed, but held in an unbreakable grasp.
It looked like a ball, not what it really was: A hole in reality. One that was trying to drag him in. But if that was so, then why hadn’t it swallowed the backpack yet?
The logical answer to that question, since it surely wanted to pull both of them in, was that it couldn’t. For whatever reason, it lacked the force, the density, or some other singular property, to absorb even the backpack—but it wanted to. It wanted him and the backpack very badly, but something was preventing it.
And then it disappeared.
It simply winked out of existence. Leaving him and the backpack to drop to the ground. He was physically and mentally in shock but otherwise unharmed. The backpack was shredded. (The food, the sandwich and the orange? Still being studied.) But young Milton staggered to his feet, dusted off his favorite blue pants, picked up the backpack, held it out and examined it. It was a moment in time that he would never forget.
And then all hell broke loose. Police, school resource officers, neighborhood watch volunteers, older kids, his parents arrived too. But it was all over and done with.
The Present.
That’s the story. I know because I interviewed him too. The fact that I follow physics and didn’t know about this guy is a failure on my part. The incident is well-known world-wide, among physicists. The kid was an instant celebrity, the only person in the world to have experienced a singularity up close while they were still theoretical. So he already knew they existed, but he also had the insight to guess that a twin singularity might not be bound by time. He spent the following twenty-two years developing the theory that allowed him to create the singularity that nearly killed him when he was eleven.
How do I know? Because that brash young researcher that the professor hates? That’s Milton Hagenbechner.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
I like the supernatural start of his story and how it inspired him to do things that no one else thought was possible. The line about an opportunistic universe is great, feels like one of the classics such as “space is big, really big, you just won’t believe how vastly hugely mindbogglingly big it is.” When you’re reminding me of Douglas Adams you’re doing something right.
Reply
Thanks Graham, very encouraging words. I like it when readers zero in on the same lines and phrases as I find to be unique.
Reply
You’re welcome Ken.
Reply
Future History, just straight up enjoy that opening contradiction. This was a nerdy exploration of the fear of L.H.C, I remember people thinking it was going to destroy the world/universe. Little do they know it just hopped us into a timeline were celebrities are destined to rule the world whilst science is mocked for having read books and studied things, losers.
I was so in the story man that the ending came to soon!
This line in particular is a favourite of mine: “The universe is opportunistic,” he said. “It makes things happen.” From the characters scientific mind it gives the impression that he sees universe as sentient were it is usually spoken of in probabilities. Me likey.
Didn't even look at which prompt it was under till just now, yeah being snatched by a singularity would definitely test my patience!
Reply
Say, wha...
Have no idea what anyone is talking about. Way above my three semesters of community college pay scale. But loved it all!
Reply
Glad you loved it, Mary. The comments, I mean. Thanks for adding to the list of interesting comments.
Reply
"So he already knew they existed, but he also had the insight to guess that a twin singularity might not be bound by time. He spent the following twenty-two years developing the theory that allowed him to create the singularity that nearly killed him when he was eleven." What an awesome twist to add context to the science! This story was so believable, though of course I hadn't heard about a gent getting nearly chewed by one, that it read more like nonfiction. That is a really cool trick, in a fascinating story. Thanks for sharing this one, Ken, and welcome to Reedsy!
Reply
Thanks Wendy. Your remarks are high praise for such a quickly crafted story. I feel like the seams are still showing and some of the rivets are loose, but if you enjoyed it, then it's functional. (I can't wait to hear what the other Ken has to say about it, if anything.)
Reply
lol :)
Reply
The other Ken, here. And he certainly has something to say about it.
At first I thought this was about quantum physics. It comes off as a bit top-heavy with the science, almost (as Wendy also said) non-fiction-sounding at times, as the good ole profs goes over the nuts and bolts of particle physics. You did a nice job including a child, so that the reader sees the otherwise overly complex phenomenon through his (innocent, or so we thought) eyes, and then you also brought in a science reporter to have the professor explain the very technical bits in layman(ish) language to him (and to those amongst us who do not partake in the congregation of the Church of Particle Physics).
I personally did physics at an advanced level in college, so I may not be the best litmus reader to test this story for readability; indeed I followed (and even enjoyed) the Profs’s scientific discourse. But of course we need to think of the layman reader here. Your piece may indeed do with simplifying some of the science-talk. Or just reducing the length of the professor’s explanations. Or simply breaking his longest paragraph with an alcohol-induced burp or an age-and-rage-induced need to wipe foam off his mouth before he utters the next thing. Because, you know readers’ attention span these days. Especially when there’s a large paragraph on little particles.
But that was my first reaction. This story is of course not about physics. It’s about generational change, and the rancor of old age versus the energy of youthfulness. Also the experience and wisdom of the old, versus the rashness and brashness of the young. That’s where your story draws its emotion from, IMHO.
And the special thing about it, the conflict? It’s in the fact, that we learn, at the end, that a young (brash, maybe) man has a more valuable possession in his life-baggage than an old professor who’s been studying that very same phenomenon all his life. Because the young scientist has had first-hand experience of a portable black hole that took a liking to his school-bag (of all things in the known and unkown universe, the metaverse and the whateverelseverse). It’s a refreshing reveal at the end of the story that the scientist is the very same Master Hagenbechner. And you didn’t need to say it. I got it from the penultimate paragraph. Strike the last line out.
Now, of course, there’s the mind-boggling time-travel hint too... Science as we know it works by studying the cause and then its consequence. In that order. If the same cause causes the same consequence in the same context, then it’s science. If it doesn’t it’s religion. Or quantum physics. If we could reverse that c-c-c (cause-consequence-context) order, then we’re in a different realm of reality. If a scientist could theorize something, then implant the cause to that consequence in his childhood years, well I think, that’d be a very interesting thing to do, to put it mildly. That’s the clever bit in your story, la twist. I’m still laboring over the chicken-and-egg factor of it all. But that’s normal with quantum physics. Got to get used to it. It’s not plain and simple as we’d like it to be.
My fave line (for the subliminal humor): “I just don’t feel like there’s much room for humor in particle physics.”
- I don’t know why I find this funny. It’s Cartisano-somehow-cracks-me-up fare. Perhaps it’s because humor ought to be amongst those subatomic particles scientists keep finding as they dig deeper in the texture of the what-is and the what-is-not? They find useless stuff like protons and electrons, neutrinos nobody needs and quarks and gluons and leptons I wouldn’t pay a dollar for, even if you gift-wrapped them nicely for me. But they haven’t found that much sought after humor-particle yet. When they do, that’s probably going to be what people-who-are-not-scientists knew about all the way. And they call it God. The one who must be so wickedly funny to have created us.
My fave line (for choice of words): “Sure,” I said. “Just a splash.” He poured one, I tossed it down, and it felt like I’d swallowed a comet.
- He swallowed what? Not a wardrobe, not a 4x4 SUV, not a cow pregnant with triplets... but a comet! Very topical. Since we’re on physics. Love it.
My fave line (for keeps): “The universe is opportunistic,” he said. “It makes things happen.”
- This may be good advice for life too. Manifest what you wish. When the opportunity is ripe, it will happen.
So, that’s my take, Ken. It’s a pleasure to read you again (it had been a while)... And, when I read your stories, apart from the sheer pleasure, each and every time I also receive a master-class in writing. No bullshitting here, and you know it.
Cheers!
Ken (M.)
Reply
I would dearly love a master class on how to leave reviews this incredible! Excellent analysis that really drove home for me exactly what it was that I liked about so many parts of this story, but could not quite elaborate upon effectively.
Reply
Wendy,
This is what I love about Ken Miles. (A.K.A. the other Ken.) Be forewarned, there may be other, other Kens, but the Miles Ken is a special Ken. And, his criticisms are spot on. I should send him my stories BEFORE I post them to contests. He shows me things in my stories that I didn't know were there: Desirable things, and not so desirable. This guy is an asset to any community he belongs to.
Reply
Ken,
That was an awfully nice way to tell me my story was boring, Ken, except to us geniuses. And I agree, (except for the part about us being geniuses.) I’m pretty sure I explained quantum physics…twice in a short story. And once in a lifetime is enough for most sane people. I’m hoping the story gets sucked into a wormhole and becomes a masterpiece in a negative universe. See there? People say I’m not an optimist, that’s bullshit. Of course I am, probably, in some other universe. But not that many.
Seriously Ken, I agree, the story is too technical, too much technicality. Too tedious. In another week, this could be a great story with about one or two-hundred less words. It desperately needs humor, and levity. As you suggested, mere brevity won't do for the physics in this story, truncation is the only remedy.
Regarding your other suggestion, I feel like I should save the last line rather than delete it, and delete most of the preceding paragraph, which sounds amateurish to me just now, too much explanation that isn’t relevant.
But hey, this is what happens when they only give you a week to write a story. What's up with that, eh? Can you find out? I wonder if we can edit our stories after the contest? Can we continue to improve them? Or do they become a testament to our inadequacy for all time?
I know you’ve got connections in faraway plazas. You probably won’t be able to tell me after you find out, but at least you’ll know.
Reply