Normal people don’t have destinies.
Of course, I never tell them that. When they come into my shop, I take their palms solemnly—after I take their payment, $25 cash or card—and stare into the blankness of their futures with undue reverence. Day after day, year after year, they come: the businessmen and the soccer moms, the mailroom clerks, dentists, and hairstylists of the world. The politicians and the theologians, too. The young and the old, the hopeful and the hopeless, the sceptics and the true believers. They all come and its always the same.
“Can you tell me my future?” They ask me.
“Maybe,” I reply with a smile. No one likes a cocky psychic. “Let me see your hand.”
I pull them by the wrist and squint. “Ah,” I say, as I hum and haw over their meaningless folds, creases in skin that are nothing more than creases, places for sweat and dirt to collect. “Ah.” I usually do this a couple of times for dramatic effect. For $25, nobody wants instant gratification.
While customers squirm in front of me, I read the only legible parts of them, which are their presents and their pasts. “Your heartline tells me that you are restless,” I impart to the man with the imprint of a wedding ring on his finger. “You have struggled to find romantic fulfilment in your partner, and you worry that you will never be satisfied.” To the woman whose cell phone is always ringing in her bag, I say: “Look here. Your lifeline is weak. This means that you lack independence and are yearning for autonomy. Your life is not your own right now, and you’re worried that you’ll never get it back.”
People are always worried about something. They come to me because they want me to voice their fears, to render them legitimate by saying them out loud.
They want me to voice their fears and then they want me to predict their resolutions. “These are turbulent times, but they are temporary.” “Your fortunes will shortly turn.” “Your suffering is almost over.”
They want me to give them hope and, for $25, I’m happy to oblige.
Normal people don’t have destinies because they have choices. They are presented with an infinite number of decisions, which unfurl an infinite number of paths. Paths that run through time like the roots of a tree that won’t stop growing. Paths with millions of interconnecting nodes and nodules. Paths that can take them anywhere. For most, there is no grand design nor divine intervention fuelling their trajectory; there is only the physics of life. Objects in motion tend to stay in motion. In the same way, people tend to keep on living, making choices, designing their own futures.
Normal people don’t have destinies and that is a blessing, because it means that nothing is impossible. Anything—literally anything—can happen. That’s why my “fortunes” sometimes come true. Customers return to me certain that I had predicted their future when, in reality, they just happened to make the right itinerary of choices to lead them to where I'd said they’d go.
It goes without saying that that’s good news for me, because it means that they will come back again and pay another $25 for another educated guess.
Normal people don’t have destinies.
But you, Customer 12, are different.
You come in just as Customer 11 of the day is leaving. I know that you don’t have an appointment, so I don’t bother to ask (I may have been blessed with the gift of sight, but I don't need to use it because I also have a watch. A glance at its face tells me that it is almost one o'clock, and I never book anyone in before my lunch break). Instead, I settle for: “how can I help you?” I try not to sound annoyed as I think of the burrito waiting in the microwave under my desk.
You ask for a palm reading. “That’ll be $25,” I tell you. “Cash or card?”
While you fumble for your wallet, I take a moment to examine you. I try to complete a standardised checklist for you in my mind. A believable fortune is based on information, so I gather all that I can find.
You are male. You might be thirty or forty, but you could be older with a youthful face. Your clothes are similarly nondescript: white t-shirt, black trousers, black tennis shoes. You aren’t wearing any jewellery and you don’t have any visible scars or tattoos, either.
Okay, Customer 12, I think to myself, You aren’t going to make this easy for me, are you?
You are completely and utterly unremarkable.
That, in itself, should have been a sign.
You pay in cash, which means that I can’t catch a glimpse of the name on your credit card, and then you follow me through the door to the divination chamber. Usually, customers ooh and ahh over the décor in here—swathes of dark velvet and damask wallpaper, curtains, beads, crystals, and curios of all kinds—but you don’t seem particularly impressed. I wonder if you can see the divination chamber for what it really is: a storage room at the back end of a strip mall storefront, as opposed to a retreat into the exotic arms of fate. But if you are sceptical of my powers, you do not say so, so I launch into the script: “Take a seat,” I rasp. Everyone seems to think that a psychic ought to have a husky voice, so I always drop mine an octave or two to give the people what they want.
You sit across from me at the table and stretch out your palm before I ask for it. New customers are usually a little nervous, tentative in the face of astrological wisdom, but not you. You seem like you know what you’re doing. When I take your hand in mine, your skin feels dry and cool.
“This isn’t your first reading,” I announce, trying to earn some premonition brownie points with you. The sooner I can convince you of my psychic aptitudes, the better.
You rebuff me with a twitch of your lips. “Yes, it is,” you say. I can already tell that you will be difficult to deceive, and I wish that you would just play along. Normal people usually want to believe.
I take your nonchalance as proof that you are lying. Fine, be that way. It’s your $25 you’re wasting. I try to redirect: “What do you hope to learn today? Is there anything specific that you seek to find?”
“No, not really.”
Oh, come on. You’re making me dig. I widen my eyes in an attempt to look sincere. “Nothing at all? There are no pressing questions in your life that need resolution? No uncertainties blocking your path? Your palm will be easier to read if I know what I’m looking for. Futures are never straightforward, you know. They are murky, even for those of us who can see them.” Give me something, I beg you silently, anything.
You pass me a smile, but it almost looks sad, somehow. For a second, I’m hopeful. Sometimes, people need to be prodded a little before they open up. Are you divorcing? Filing for bankruptcy? Battling a scary diagnosis? I hold my breath in anticipation, but you leave me disappointed.
“I don’t think you’ll have too much trouble with mine,” you assure me.
Another dead end. Great.
I try not to roll my eyes at you. “Okay, I’ll do my best.”
Normal people don’t have destinies, they have emotions. Waves of them, oceans, currents, cacophonies—that’s what we psychics try to read. So, when I reach for your open palm, I prepare myself for a familiar drenching. I prime myself to be submerged in everything that you have felt, are feeling, or could ever feel. That is the closest thing to a destiny that I have ever experienced: a thrashing of cogent and tangent potential energies.
I hold my breath and wait for it. But when I touch you, I feel only one thing.
Frustration.
It starts in the pit of my stomach and builds. Builds until I want to scream, until I’m trembling, until every shred of me seems to become it. It’s an infection, this frustration, bacterial, viral, feral. It moves into my body, and it takes up residence there. It wraps around my insides like a snake waiting to feed.
It hurts.
I gasp before I can stop myself, but you don’t flinch. You don’t even seem surprised. You try to pull your hand away, but I can’t let go. In that moment, holding onto you becomes the only thing stopping me from ripping my hair out, from gnashing my teeth until they break. Holding onto you becomes the only thing keeping me from slamming my face into the table, from trying to prize open my skull to release the pressure by allowing some of this noxious frustration to escape. If I let go of you, I am afraid that I will let go of myself, too, so I burrow my nails deeper and deeper into your wrist until you bleed.
Normal people don’t have destinies because they have choices.
Normal people don’t have destinies and that is a blessing, because destiny is tyranny reified and deified. It’s powerlessness and anguish. It’s the violent eradication of choice.
Normal people don’t have destinies, Customer 12, but you do.
You have never had any possibilities, only certainties, and you have bounced against the confines of the pre-set track you’re on until you have bruised black and blue with desire. Every time you move, you meet resistance, and it has pressed down on you until you are exhausted. It has strangled you—it is strangling you, it will strangle you—into submission.
Everything that you’ve ever done, you have been meant to do. And the worst part is, you know it. You are meant to be here now, and you know it. You are meant to bleed, and you know it. After this, you will leave, and you know that wherever you go next will be the place that you are meant to be. And as you tumble from right place to right place, you will eventually find yourself asking: if everything in your life is predetermined, is anything about you really you?
Is any joy that you feel organic? Is any emotion, or whim, or fleeting thought spontaneous? Or has it all been pre-decided for you by some unseeable, unfathomable force?
Normal people don’t have destinies, but you do, so you’ll never get to know where you end and where fate begins.
You’ll never know if you love your wife because you love her, or because you are meant to love her. And you do love her, so one day you will start to worry that you are robbing her of a more genuine form of love that she deserves to inspire in someone who could choose not to love her back.
And when this question finally consumes you to the point that you can't even stand to touch her, you will wonder if you destroyed your marriage or if this, too, was the brutal hands of destiny at work.
One day, you will contemplate ending it all, but you will know that killing yourself will not be escape, or solace, or rebellion. If you do it, you will know that dying was fated and if you do not, you’ll know that living was fated. So, you won’t bother.
Instead, you will wake up every day and you will do whatever it is that you are meant to do. You will go on and on and on. You will go on, and you will doubt. You will never trust yourself. You will never be sure of anything except that you have a destiny, which means that you’ll never be sure of anything at all.
I’m still shaking when you finally pry me from your wrist. Your touch is surprisingly gentle, and when you look at me, your expression is contrite. “I’m sorry,” you say, and I can tell that you mean it. You knew that this would happen, but you didn’t have a choice.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
Excellent writing skill. Horrible content. It's as if you're trying to convince people that they don't have destinies, based on your finite, flawed and rather morose idea of what destiny is. I wish you would use your talent for something more constructive. Not that it's only you, mind. It seems to be a theme more and more these days. Sad. Just sad.
Reply
Congratulations on winning. Writing from a prompt, in a short period of time, is daunting. But, I see I am clearly in the minority, a minority of one, maybe, with my opinion. I was rather offended by the story. You implied that "psychic" readers are mere con artists, or carny performers, who go by cues, tricks, and from what they glean from their own questions. Of course, store front readers, like your character, are very often frauds. They are the ones infamous for asking for money to remove a black cloud or curse someone put on you by lighting a candle. But, you employ all the clichés that readers have always had used against them. Many psychics read by phone now with no visual cues. A phone can be a good, direct psychic connection, with no visual distractions, and many prefer it. And good readers ask no questions and ask the client not to give any clues, not even a name, until they feel they have connected with them. The first 10 minutes of focusing are the hardest, as clients fight the reader by throwing up psychic roadblocks to make the reader prove her/himself. Huge hurdles to leap right out of the gate. You say palm lines are nothing but paths of sweat, or something. Palm readers, unlike psychics, of course, have to be in person, hands on, as it were. But, obviously, you have never been to a really good palm reader or studied palm reading. Learning to read palms is a tough study. You repeat refrains like it's a song, as if truths. Is it meant to be poetry? The resolution of the story is over my head. The guy apologized for infecting you with his "frustration," enough so that you made him bleed? He left. Reader now in knots? Who escaped their fate? Was it the fate of the reader, who learned he/she was not a total fraud, as he/she suddenly was a sensitive empath with #12's reading? Sorry I am so negative. It's just that after 50 years of these sort of constant insults, accusations, and negativity projected on those of us in the field can make us pretty defensive.
Reply
I truly hope you aren’t offended by this; Sandy, but there are a great many people who simply do not believe in psychics. This does not mean they don’t exist, it doesn’t mean that they’re fake, it simply means that some people just don’t believe in them. That is why I think it is wrong to take offense from the simple story, only meant to spread joy through the readers upon this site. And if you did not like it, then that is fine, but do not take offense at the description of a psychic within this story. Again, I mean no offense when I say this.
Reply
Hey Sandy, wild idea--maybe instead of using the comments section to give us your own personal views on psychics, you could, I don't know, write a story of your own? Just a thought.
Reply
Damn. This was good. I love that you wrote this in first person. It makes the reader sweat and worry just a bit more. The pacing of this was excellent. I kept wanting to see how this would end, while enjoying the ride at the same time. Great job with that!
It can be risky to repeat the same powerful line throughout a story because it can lose some of its potency and possibly annoy the reader. But, when the line is that good and the meaning of it so interwoven into the plot, as this one is, it works beautifully.
A quick word about/to the readers commenting about the judge's comment. Be upset if you want, that is fine. We all get offended from time to time. But, complaining about it on this author's page, beneath a first-prize entry (that we all want and strive for) is probably taking away some joy from his/her accomplishment. I think a better move would've been to comment to the judge privately.
Great job, HR! Write on.
Reply
If I was the author I'd be upset with the comments left, knowing my fellow writers would read them and feel disheartened. So that would be the joy of the win taken away for me.
Unnecessary.
Reply
Steve, I think that's an excellent idea, and as soon as Reedsy realizes that it would be beyond helpful (for both positive and negative reasons) to have a system wherein you can message another author on here, I'm all for it. Unfortunately, someone thought a site that publishes fiction should be set up exactly like Reddit.
Reply
I've wrestled with this same sort of Boethian philosophy a few times. I've found the inverse is often the more common situation, where true freedom is actually the most terrifying because of the chaos and meaninglessness most people fave, but it's nice to think there's comfort in choice rather than the usual anxiety and FOMO pharmaceutical companies and therapists fund yacht clubs with.
As a judge, this was the best story I judged by far and probably the only one worth commenting on at all, so allow me to indulge in a touch of nitpicking for the sake of leaving ANY feedback for someone this week:
I presume tiu meant "pry" instead of "prize," because autocorrect is a bitch, but someone said there's a context where prize fits so I said, sure sure, lemme find something else.
Towards the latter third of the story I noticed a lot of spots where a contraction would've made the prose far smoother. We almost never speak WITHOUT contractions in natural speech, so when we encounter them while reading it can drastically disturb pace of feel like literary speed bumps making the process rocky. It also cuts wordcounts, which I always find as a better pure distillation of what we're trying to convey than we get from extra words. I'm not saying I noted that issue a lot, but a few tweaks here or there mightve tightened things up a bit. Submissions only get a week for a lot of work, so I empathize if everything isn't polished gold. I don't generally like a nice polish anyways.
That all said, I'm only picking because I had to and it's the only story with promise that I read worth bothering to stay invested in the whole way through. This is what short fiction is about and I dig it. Gave me a mellower Joe Hill vibe like from his Strange Weather collection. Great work. Thanks for giving me at least one story to shortlist and 5 star.
Reply
When other entrants are bound to read the winning entry and their comments, it's quite disconcerting when we come across a 'judge' who claims that this is 'the only story with promise' and makes me now feel as though my voice will never be heard nor cared about. I think I'll avoid entering any competitions that you happen to judge in the future if I can help it. I suppose that means I'm done with Reedsy. Thanks for the harsh dismissal from the site overall. I won't waste your time or my $5 again in the future.
Reply
I completely agree. I think I'll just save my $5 from now on.
Reply
Such a comment from a reviewer is truly shocking, especially considering that the rating system for stories entering the contest is quite cryptic. Those submitting a story into the competition do not receive any feedback from reviewers, either in the form of comments or scores, which ends up limiting progress as writers. Nor do they know, for example, how many reviewers have read the story in question. Comments of this nature only worsen the lack of transparency and feedback for participants.
Reply
I like how your reaction isn't, "I should do better" and settle for "I don't like competition." You could always submit without paying $5 for judges to do what they do: judge.
Reply
You have such a bad attitude. There is absolutely no need for your rudeness.
Reply
"That all said, I'm only picking because I had to and it's the only story with promise that I read worth bothering to stay invested in the whole way through. "
"As a judge, this was the best story I judged by far and probably the only one worth commenting on at all,"
...weird flex from a judge. Yikes.
Reply
IKR?? Such a poorly veiled ego trip. I reported the comment and I hope this person gets fired from being a judge. Despite all the Boethian philosophy this person's supposedly read, they know nothing about the true soul of writing.
Reply
I reported this judge's comments also. Rude and obnoxious. Reedsy needs to vet their judges better. Some of RW Mack's comments were completely inappropriate and unnecessary, no matter how many stories or books he might have under his belt. It doesn't give one license to be a jerk. I didn't enter a story this time and I will certainly think twice before entering one in the future. All that nastiness aside, your story is fantastic HR! I love your writing style and how you kept my eyes pinned on your every word! An excellent piece!
Reply
No one's entitled to praise just because they paid $5 to submit a sub-par story and if people are offended, rhwy should probably reflect on their own writing and consider if they're ready for the public to have opinions on it. I left a positive critique because this submission was good. If I left a negative review on all the submissions we ho through that simply aren't good enough to bother finishing, you'd all be much more upset. Here's a thought, which is better: letting someone think they're good enough to not learn and strive to do better or making a critical critique of someone's work with suggestions to possibly raise their standard?
I like how people would rather complain about a comment calling a story good than bother praising the person who wrote the story for doing good. This is very telling of the reading audience on this site and how self-indulgent they are. Surprise, someone did a better job than others in a competition and people are upset they have to accept that perhaps they aren't as good as they could be.
Maybe judges should be REQUIRED to leave commentary so you'd see how the dozens of judges actually see your work rather than combing through literal hundreds of submissions to click approve or deny. I wonder how upset everyone would be if they saw their ratings too.
Complain all you want, but remember that it's not worth much. If I was this writer seeing how many people would rather complain about how their stories aren't being called out as good than say anything about their story that WAS good, I'd be a little perturbed with the community.
Reply
I was planning to report your comment, RW, and call it good. But I wanted you to know the effect this negative comment had on me. I tried writing a story this week and in the end decided against it thinking you might be the one judging it. I have thick skin, and have had many pieces “ripped to shreds” in my day – I’m not new to critique. If you were just another commenter I would brush this all aside. But you’re not just another commenter, you are a judge (which you make known repeatedly). In my opinion a judge should decide on work that is above the rest, yes. But why do you feel the need to tear everyone else down as you go? I am genuinely asking this question to you, not in an accusatory way, just genuinely curious: why do you have this need? Looking at your comments, I do feel like you have constructive and helpful things to say. I’m just curious why you repeatedly have to unnecessarily criticize others’ work in the process. It’s not that I am afraid of what you might say of my work – I don’t really care, to be honest – but what I can’t abide is that your comments are always a double edged sword – one side elevating a writer, while the other side cuts others down. Even if you did like my work (again, I don’t care if you do), I wouldn’t want your comment on my page if it meant discouraging other writers. To me, writing is hope, writing is healing. And investing $5 in myself, even when I know I may not have a winning story, is a kind of win for me because I chose to believe in myself and put myself out there despite how vulnerable it feels, which is, in my opinion, the hardest thing to do. Your job (which you signed up for) is to look for the pieces that shine above the rest. That’s it. What if you tried taking your own story out of the comments, and thought just about elevating the writer you’re judging. Here are some ideas/edits from comments you’ve made recently on this story and others:
“Finally a story worth shortlisting. Also, the last story in the whole submission pool. Pacing felt GREAT, especially after a rough week to judge with so much I couldn't even give 4 stars.”
Instead, what if you tried: “Pacing felt GREAT!”
“As a judge, this was the best story I judged by far and probably the only one worth commenting on at all,”
Instead, what if you tired: “This was the best story I’ve read in awhile!”
“That all said, I'm only picking because I had to and it's the only story with promise that I read worth bothering to stay invested in the whole way through.”
Instead, what if you tried: “This story kept me invested the whole way through.”
“It's nice to see a submission I can judge with decent bones and structure. Some submissions seem like they're teepees I'd blow over walking by versus having a story with a foundation to build on.”
Instead, what if you tried: “Your story had decent bones and structure.”
“Judging some stories is something of a chore. I trudge through as far as I can, but after 5 paragraphs of the same quality, I suspect I've seen the extent of their skillset and give up greater expectations.”
Instead, what if you tried: “Your story kept me engaged all the way through, which is a hard thing to accomplish, so well done!”
Ok, thanks for taking the time to read. Truly wishing you growth in your journey. I am planning to stay on this site for another week so you have time to perhaps read this comment, then plan to leave. I think I can do better.
Reply
No one is asking for praise, just that their stories be read, which you don't seem to care to do. There is no need for nastiness.
Reply
Having just lost precious minutes of my life reading some of your work, Mack, I'm genuinely curious as to what qualifies you to be a judge of writing? Or is Reedsy just allowing anyone who raises their hand to assess work people have paid to submit to a contest?
Yes, writing is subjective. Absolutely. But very few people would have a hard time discerning a five-star bistro for a fast food chain. You're barely a Burger King. I do thank you though, because I think my days of submitting to contests are here are over unless there's some kind of upheaval in the way it's run now that you've cast a light on how it works (or doesn't, rather).
I'm happy to just post my stories and let those that want to enjoy them have at it. Apologies to HR for posting all this on a wonderful story, but Reedsy also doesn't supply us with a form for voicing concerns, so I guess we can add that to the list of things that should change.
Reply
". . .and probably the only one worth commenting on at all"
Maybe you shouldn't be a judge.
Reply
Maybe submissions should be higher quality
Reply
"That all said, I'm only picking because I had to"
Doesn't sound like a very good attitude for a judge in a paid contest.
Reply
Your work probably wasn't good enough for consideration in a paid contest, yet here we are.
Praise for the sake of praise is exactly what people want because highlighting an individual for good work inherently makes others feel like their work was inferior, which it probably was. That's why they won and others didn't. Why you'd choose a public venue to point out your insecurities and inability is beyond me. I told this person they did a better job that others. I don't see why you can't praise them once for the same thing. They won, after all.
What you're really upset about is an inability to self reflect because you don't want to admit what you had to face in the open: you need to work harder because you're work wasn't good enough to win. Maybe it was grammar or topic choice of sentence pacing. I don't know. I didn't judge your work. Maybe if a judge had been decent enough to tell you why you didn't make their short list, you'd have gained some knowledge. More likely, you'd have ignored it or attacked them. How much criticism have you ignored that could've made you better? Because I'm thinking this author who received criticism just like you have hasn't ignored it in the past and taken it for what it was to improve upon. That's probably why they won and you haven't. You don't like admitting that a judge other than me didn't like your work enough either. That sucks. Welcome to writing. If you're not comfortable with putting your spirit and skills into the limelight for others to see and inevitably judge as readers, whether it's an Amazon review, a comment online or a beta reader, then perhaps writing isn't for you. But I'm hoping it is, because if you decided to focus on why you didn't win and this story did, you might win next week. I look forward to it. I'd be the first to cheer you on if I could.
But you'd rather complain here that someone else was told they did better than a lot of other submissions (with nothing directed at you until now) than out that energy towards the next set of prompts. Or will you just quit? Show me the content of your character in the next story or give up now.
Reply
Can you read? What people are upset about is that you flat out admitted to not reading stories you are supposed to be judging.
Reply