🏆 Contest #322 Winner!

Adventure

This story contains sensitive content

CW: Mental health, violence, war

The soldiers file into the mess hall, squeezing onto benches and finding open places away from the canvas walls to sit. Outside, the wind shrieks, whipping and beating tarps throughout the whole encampment, in some places tearing them from their posts.

Calling it a mess hall is an overstatement, since it’s all just one big tent. There are windows near the top, flexible sheets of plastic framed in velcro and wire to hold it in place. The hall is propped up on portable wooden beams, built to keep the waves of sand and mud out of the cook pots. But it fails even at that.

The soldiers in the mess hall are a mixture of men and women, dark skin and fair, short, tall, brawny and lean. There are even children. Somewhere. They’re the families of soldiers who couldn’t find anywhere to put them while they were away.

Their murmurs and cries are barely audible over the scrape and clatter of meal time in the mess hall, though today the mood is unusually subdued. A single thought occupies every conversation, every thought, every dream.

What comes next?

A ribbon of fresh, cool air cuts through the muggy atmosphere, turning the soldiers' heads. Captain Eighteen has returned, holding the battle plans high above her head, while her sharp eyes sweep over the room. Captains Sixteen and Forty are just behind her, similar plans in their hands.

“Command sent instructions.” They don’t say more. They don’t need to.

The rustle of papers now joins the depressed mutterings, the sheets making their way around the room.

The Captains never bother announcing anything anymore. Those who care will find the information, and those who don’t likely won't survive the war.

We’ll all die anyway.

It’s treason to say so, but no one follows the laws anymore. There’s no one left to enforce them.

Soldier sits tucked in a corner, out of sight, out of mind. He stays huddled behind the tallest of his comrades, keeping to himself and listening to the conversation of soldiers nearby.

They refer to each other as Two hundred six, Eight-oh-ninety, and so on.

Soldier had had a number once. A name, even, but that was before. Numbers had replaced names when names had become too common. The deaths, too common.

There had been an agreement, once the death rate topped the birth rate worldwide. When one isn’t likely to remember every soldier that dies in battle, what right does one have to demand that they themselves be remembered? That was one of the only ideas that every side of the war agreed on.

Numbers are still common among friends and relatives, but not for strangers and average cannon fodder. And so the soldiers referred to each other as Soldier, and the children as Child, and the parents as Father, Mother or Guardian.

There had been a time once when the world had cared if you considered yourself attracted to the same gender. When the world cared if you disagreed with your genetic identity. When the world cared if skin was light or dark. When the world cared about money.

The idea seems laughable now.

Soldier stays in his corner, watching the edges of the tarp flap open to admit more and more sludge, until it has covered the toes of his boots. He feels the air swirl around him, mingling with the breaths and heat of the others until it rises up, up and is replaced by a new draft, and the process is repeated.

He wishes he could join it, rise higher and higher until the world forgets he ever existed. Instead, he begins to eat.

The food tray in front of him is set with a generic sustenance pack of required nutrient pills, a scentless paste to simulate being full, and an unlabeled packet for flavor.

There’s no entertainment at meal time, no story telling. They used to gather around the largest table, laugh and drink and tell stories, but there are no stories to tell. All anyone remembers is past battles, and nobody wants to hear more about the war.

When the bell rings, no one is sorry to leave the hall. Soldier watches them, wishing they’d linger, wishing they’d delay the inevitable. But they never do.

For years, Soldier has slipped through the holes in death’s net. Incredibly lucky, Captain Eighteen says. Incredibly unfortunate, Soldier replies, for I am the only one.

Soldier meets Eighteen at the doorway. They stand together, watching the wind blow sand and mud across the barren landscape. Trees were chopped and burnt around the same time the war had been officially declared. Now the earth and wind mingle freely, with nothing to root it down, creating the nightmarish landscape they live in today.

They don’t have much to say. They’d said everything there was to say long before this, but still they stand together, waiting for words to come. The bell rings, signaling the breaking of camp. Neither Eighteen nor Soldier linger, wait for one last chance to speak. There’s nothing left to be said.

Soldier stands at imperfect attention. One of his proudest achievements is seeming just ordinary enough to not get promoted. The last thing Soldier needs is to be responsible for the deaths of fallen comrades. Once was enough.

Eighteen, Sixteen and Forty are standing on the stage. They project confidence, but Soldier knows the pain they carry inside. Their energy isn’t adrenalin or even righteous fury, but a sort of restrained recklessness that follows the floods of grief they were made to survive. Soldier stares straight ahead, but can feel Eighteen’s eyes on him. She’s always been the emotional one, in the time they’d served together. Some would call her coldhearted, ruthless, heartless, but what the other soldiers don’t know is that deep down, she cares. She simply refuses to allow herself to act on it.

The Captains begin battle prep, an exercise made of short drills and then a briefing of any new information they’ve received from the command center. Soldier remembers the whistles, explosions and fire.

There is no information.

There is no command center.

Soldier executes his drills almost perfectly, recites the briefing back with nearly complete proficiency. He doesn’t meet Eighteen’s eyes.

And then the men, women, children of the Last War march through wind and rain, to the next battle ground, the next war, the next slaughter.

Soldier has locked his heart away by the time the battle has started. Cannons boom, bombs whistle, and threaded through it all is the pop-pop-popping of gunfire. Ash rains and smoke rises, masking the sky and casting the land in a darkness like midnight.

He is positioned behind the Horse, a war machine made for more efficient killing on the battlefield. It was based on the idea that, once upon a time, captains had ridden tamed animals into battle. It looks nothing like the mythical horse, but no one aside from Soldier knows this.

Eighteen looks at him once more, and this time he does meet her gaze. They stare at each other, knowing what comes next and yet still waiting for words to come. Soldier breaks the connection first.

Soldier moves forwards in what is more a leisurely stroll than a march. He doesn't fire his weapon, doesn’t draw a knife or wrestle anyone down.

Instead, he makes his way up a hill, listening to the war and men scream around him. The draft of fresh air is gone, replaced by sulfur and smoke and what might be a trace of tear gas. All coordinated attempts at war had fallen apart far, far in the past, and all Soldier is left with is this cacophony of death.

He finally finds the crest of a hill and sits, watching the fight, the struggle. He watches his friends pass into a new world, a better one. He watches a soldier from a different side of the war charge up the hill towards him and get gunned down for the effort. He waits for the battle to slow, for the death to end. Soldier stands, letting the battle unfold beneath him, the numbness of grief leaving him near emotionless. Unwilling to kill, unwilling to be killed, inaction leaves Soldier hovering at the edge of battle.

He sees Eighteen on the Horse, progressing towards the general of the other side, General One. Soldier is the only person watching, the only person to notice the bullet shot into the Horse's engine, the only person to witness Eighteen's death.

Eighteen had never been his everything, but she’d been something, when nothing else was. Something falls down his face, leaving a track from his eye to his chin. Soldier doesn’t bother to check what it is. Soot, maybe, or ashes.

He watches the armies clash, push, shrink down to nothing, and it finally becomes real. The truth never hit him, not when he enlisted, not when his first love had gone missing in action, not when his first platoon was blown to smitharines, not even when the news reached them that everyone, everywhere was to be conscripted. Even his family.

But now he feels it, the grief and anger and raw nerves, pressing against his eyes and head and heart. Eighteen’s death was the last straw.

He knows exactly how he could have avoided this, what he could have done. In hindsight, it’s obvious.

At the beginning, there had been pacifists. A long, long time ago, back when he’d been a boy. A boy with a name, a job at a restaurant, a family and a horse.

The pacifists had said that what the world needed was peace agreements, treaties, neighborly love, acceptance. They were ignored for the most part, and when they weren’t, they were taken care of. The pacifists had disappeared, unable to fight their fight, and the world had turned to this. Battle after battle, conflict after conflict, war after war.

There are sides to the war, fighting for glory, land, riches, revenge. But it’s all the same, int he end. The first fight was Pacifists against the world. And the world had won.

Soldier had fought the wrong fight, served the wrong cause. Soldier became a soldier, and that had been the wrong call to make.

No longer shrouded in blissful numbness, Soldier finds himself at the bottom, searching for someone, anyone he could tell. He stumbles across the empty shells that once held comrades.

This had to stop, the blood had to stop. There’d never been a reason they fought. Their intentions had been to win the war, but what was the war? Senseless, irreversible.

They’d fought on the wrong side, and now everyone is dead because of it.

The smoke from the Horse's explosion is gone, wafted away. Ash still rains, but there is no gunfire. There are no bombs, no engines humming, no cannons blasting. Only a field of death.

The darkness clears just slightly, enough for Solder to see the metal shaft at his feet.

After a moment of hesitation, Soldier lifts it up off the earth. Coarse and riddled with holes, it takes extreme care to keep it intact.

Standing alone in the valley that only minutes ago held war, Soldier raises the flag of victory high and plants it in the ground.

The war is over, and Soldier has won.

But he’s lost too.

The flag stands, but only barely, banner fluttering despite the rain.

Then he falls to his knees, hands clasped behind his head as he struggles to keep himself under control. Soldier looks up once more, up at the flag, at the smog choked sky, waiting for it to end.

He watches the earth packed around the pole give away in the harsh weather, until the flag falls, sodden and torn, to the earth.

Then, in the silence, loss and grief of a pointless war fought to its end, the final soldier of the last war dies.

Posted Oct 04, 2025
Share:

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

29 likes 29 comments

18:16 Oct 10, 2025

Dude! In the indelible words of Johnny Depp, “Have a donut.” This contest isn’t a career starter or breaker, and not every story will appeal to every reader. Have you heard of Critters? It’s a sci-fi writers’ forum for sharing critiques. The admin has several excellent articles on useful criticism and what works and what doesn’t. I think you might benefit from those articles.

A long, unsolicited list of criticisms won’t make anyone a better writer. If you want to be an editor, sign up on Reedsy. Writing is hard. Putting your writing out into the world for strangers to feed on is terrifying, and if you don’t feel that, you’re probably doing something wrong.

I sign up and pay for the contest when a prompt inspires me. I pay, not because I have an expectation of winning, but because I want to support the effort. I submit because I try to write a short story every week (see Ray Bradbury) and this provides an excellent opportunity for accountability.

To any writers who happen upon this thread, I hope you don’t let it discourage you; keep writing. And to Ms. Moore, while my personal preference is a more stripped-down style, I saw a lot of heart in your story. Congratulations on your win. Keep writing!

Reply

19:02 Oct 10, 2025

My point exactly.

Ms Moore is a beginner writer on reedsy (no account history), and for a first time to make 1st place? That's amazing!
Denne wrote that she chose "The Last Soldier" as the winner because she was “blown away by the beauty of the writing [...]”
While the writing style isn’t the most polished, she clearly states that it won because it is “incredibly compelling, [...] distinctly individual, and a perfect composite.”
Denne also writes that the ending, “absolutely floored me, filled with regret and wisdom. Wonderful, evocative, heartbreaking writing.”
Ms Moore won, and for a good reason, too.
Maybe she is inexperienced, maybe she overuses certain phrases, but she clearly impressed the judge with her entry.
It's not “fluffing” to say she did well, and there's no need to insult her work for it, when she, a novice, had an emotion and depth other authors lacked.

Reply

Tamsin Liddell
21:24 Oct 10, 2025

Except the writing was not beautiful! It was ugly!

Denne lied to this woman.

Reply

Emma Parker
21:59 Oct 10, 2025

I know that everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but I think Ms. Moore wrote a beautiful story. You may have your own ideas about the judging process, but she won. And, writing a list 70+ criticisms on her work isn’t helpful, it’s hurtful. So, before you go saying that someone writing was ‘ugly’, maybe think for a second before sending out something that will hurt someone.

Reply

Beth Goode
03:17 Oct 11, 2025

Agreed. Also, I'm guessing the judges aren't expecting perfectly edited stories written within a week's timeframe, and most people are probably doing this in their spare time.

Reply

Arora Gleans
14:51 Oct 10, 2025

The naming convention was very interesting—Soldier, Child, and using numbers instead of names highlights the gravity of the war-torn setting. Congratulations on the win! :)

Reply

Maisie Sutton
04:19 Oct 11, 2025

Congratulations on your win, Caroline! I believe the sign of a good story is that it elicits emotions and sometimes, strong reactions. i hope you continue to write and find the supportive corners of the Reedsy community❤️

Reply

Emma Parker
22:02 Oct 10, 2025

Great job! This story is very moving, and beautifully written. The naming of the characters, the way you expressed the pain and suffering of the soldiers and captains, it’s all greatly expressed. Congrats on the win!

Reply

Mahshid Alidaie
20:36 Oct 10, 2025

Excellent work! Well done!!

Reply

John Rutherford
06:54 Oct 11, 2025

Congrats

Reply

Boni Woodland
06:09 Oct 11, 2025

Keep writing, Caroline. Your story was thought-provoking, and it presented your characters interestingly. {Had to smile as I numbered my sons instead of using their names when I write about them, after you have so many —it's easier!) Congratulations on your win. I don't know enough about writing yet myself to criticize your skills. I find it somewhat fearful the way some on this platform are shredding your story. I wasn't aware that's what Reedsy was for. I applaud your bravery and imagination.

Reply

Carol Nelson
04:58 Oct 11, 2025

The end of the world brought about not by destruction of of fauna and flora,nor polution of the atmosphere and ocean so much as man's inhumanity to his species. Every politician needs to become a pacifist to save the world but will this ever happen? A powerful message well done Caroline.

Reply

Gary Diehl
03:41 Oct 11, 2025

And on another note, I found this site and thought what a great opportunity to share stories with others, get feedback and maybe get some recognition if it’s warranted. But wow, if this is one of those places where trolls are just sitting back waiting to beat up on people who put themselves out there, no thanks.

Reply

Gary Diehl
03:31 Oct 11, 2025

Wow. I submitted my first story here on this contest. Glad I didn’t win because it would have sucked to be subject to this kind of criticism if my first shot was a winner.
Geez people, how about some support and congrats to a new writer giving it her first shot?

Nice job Caroline and congrats. Keep it up!

Reply

Mary Bendickson
02:29 Oct 11, 2025

Congrats on the win and welcome to Reedsy.

Reply

Zanna Barton
01:38 Oct 11, 2025

Excellent job pointing out the futility of all war.
Wellington said: "Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won."

Reply

Kelly H
01:14 Oct 11, 2025

Congrats on the win and keep writing! I also liked the naming convention and found it well-suited for the subject matter and the short-story format.

Reply

Tamsin Liddell
12:50 Oct 10, 2025

I think this needs to be said:
I am not a good writer. I am a poor writer.
But if this was my first draft, I 'd be embarrassed.
There is no way this should have won the contest. Nothing personal against Ms Moore, who I am sure is a perfectly nice person who intends to be an excellent writer some day.
That day just isn’t now.
It’s not even one of the five best stories for this particular prompt. “Anayalaj” (by Kelsey R Davis) is far superior in every way.
I heard an anecdote, through the grapevine, of a previous Guest Judge told by Reedsy that they couldn’t choose their actual choices, instead being given a completely different list of stories to choose from. There are email images to support it.
I am curious if that is the case again. Especially given that, *yet again* we are provided with one veteran and two newbies as the top three stories.
This is a habit. It is a travesty. And it really needs to stop.
Someone with legal background ought to look into the contest laws and regulations being violated by Reedsy, because this is ridiculous.

(For the record, I stopped paying for the contest weeks ago. So this isn’t sour grapes. Like I said, I’m not winner-worthy. But this isn’t either.)

That said, I honestly want Ms Moore to get better. So here is *my opinion* on what needs to be fixed. And trust me, I held back.

(1) Repeated use of the term “mess hall.” The first is understandable. The second is acceptable. The third is irrelevant and unnecessary. Third paragraph should start “The soldiers are a mixture…”
(2) Same paragraph:. The one-word sentence “Somewhere” is non sequitor.
(3) Fourth paragraph: Lacking a clear antecedent to “their.” Is it the soldiers? The children? The families?
(4) Same: Again, “in the mess hall” is unneeded. This is a short story, not free-form poetry.
(5) Fifth paragraph: Italics: /What comes next?/
(6) Sixth paragraph: “the” in “the battle plans” is extraneous.
(7) Same: The second use of “plans” (last sentence) should be synonymed. “Paperwork” or something. (Would suggest “papers” too, but that’s in two paragraphs.)
(8) Ninth paragraph: First sentence is already proven a lie. They just announced something. So need to rephrase.
(9) Tenth paragraph: Italics: /We’ll all die anyway./
(10) Eleventh paragraph: “law,” not “laws.” And “it,” not “them.”
(11) Thirteenth paragraph: “eight-ninety,” not “eight-oh-ninety.” Even if it was meant to be “8090,” it would be said differently (eighty-ninety)..
(12) Fifteenth paragraph: “There was” instead of “There had been.”
(13) Same: “Mortality rate,” not “death rate.” I suppose it could be fine, but it’s not the proper term.
(14) Same: To be perfectly honest, this paragraph is the strongest one read to this point, except for the wording. This should be the “thesis” paragraph, the one that grabs the reader, and it’s fifteen paragraphs in. Rearrange and rewrite.
(15) Sixteenth paragraph: “but” isn’t needed. It may seem silly, given that you’re over a thousand words under the limit, but part of pacing, smoothness, and readability are the speed bumps you put into the sentence. The fewer undescriptive and unnecessary words you have, not only do you have more allowance elsewhere should you be up against the limit (like if it was a 2K limit instead of 3K), but the easier it is on your readers’ eyes.
(16) Speaking of easier. It’s more formatting than actual writing, but I suggest a line feed between each paragraph, and a *** line or whatever between each section. Again, easier to read.
(17) Same paragraph: “the soldiers,” “the children,” and “the parents” should all lose “the.”
(18) Seventeenth paragraph: “when the world had cared” should be “when the world cared.”
(19) Same paragraph: There are wars waged about religion, politics, ethnicity, liberty, and economics. There have yet to be any wars (and I mean real, actual, army vs army type wars, not just social network back and forths) about sexuality or mental illness. This paragraph would do better to stick to real wars, not fantasies.
(20) Eighteenth paragraph: This sentence, given that the previous one-sentence paragraphs have been thoughts, would do better matching their typography: /The idea seems laughable now./
(21) Twenty-first paragraph: “simulate being full” is awkward; I think coming from the opposite side (“silence hunger pangs” or somesuch) would be better for it.
(22) Twenty-second paragraph: “storytelling” not “story telling”
(23) Same: “once gathered” is better than “used to gather.”
(24) Same: “to” in front of “laugh.” Otherwise, this sentence looks like a series that runs on and needs commas instead of ands.
(25) Same: “storytelling,” “tell stories,” “stories to tell.” Again, this is a short story, not a poem. You need variety in your word selection, especially in quick succession.
(26) Twenty-fourth paragraph: Put the “sayings” in italics, if not quotes. /Incredibly lucky. Incredibly unfortunate, for I am the only one./
(27) Same: Probably “I’m” instead of “I am.”
(28) Twenty-fifth paragraph: “war,” not “the war,” and “earth,” not “the earth”
(29) Same: “they live in today” could be cut without losing a thing.
(30) Twenty-sixth paragraph: “They’ve” not “They’d.”
(31) Same: “waiting” not “wait”
(32) Twenty-eighth paragraph: Again, disproving the line earlier that they don’t make announcements.
(33) Same: Rewrite: “In the time they’ve served together, she’s been the emotional one.” Always is unneeded, and they’d is wrong tense.
(34) Same: Instead of “Some would call her,” “She exudes an impression of being…” Or something along those lines. This is more active and defined. Anybody could be called things by anyone without any evidence.
(35) Twenty-ninth paragraph: “Except” in front of “Soldier.”
(36) Thirtieth and Thirty-first paragraphs: again, turn them into direct thoughts (in italics), and reverse their order. /There is no command center. There is no information./ They could be combined into one paragraph, but two is fine too, I think.
(37) Thirty-third paragraph: “battleground,” not “battle ground.”
(38) Thirty-fourth paragraph: “starts,” not “has started.”
(39) Thirty-fifth paragraph: “It was based on the idea that” is extraneous and its removal improves the sentence and paragraph.
(40) Same: “rode,” not “had ridden.” If anywhere deserves an active verb, not passive, it’s this spot.
(41) Thirty-sixth paragraph: “meets” instead of “does meet.”
(42) Thirty-seventh paragraph: rewrite the series. “He doesn’t fire his weapon, draw a knife, or wrestle anyone down.”
(43) Thirty-eighth paragraph: rewrite. “Coordinated attempts at war fell apart far in the past. All that’s left is the cacophony of death.”
(44) Thirty-ninth paragraph: “a different side of the war” is too wordy; “the other side” suffices, or “opposing” or whatever..
(45) Same: the end of that same sentence could probably use a rewrite as well. “He watches as an opposing soldier charges up his hill, only to be gunned down for the effort.”
(46) Same: “near” should be deleted.
(47) Fortieth paragraph: logic fails. Surely the shooter was watching? This last half of the paragraph feels anticlimactic when it’s supposed to be the buildup of the climax. Especially after it turns out to have been an explosion.
(48) Forty-first paragraph: tense. “Has,” not “Had.” Not to mention you really need to take the “present perfect” and “present past” tense out back, shoot it in the head like someone just shot Eighteen, and bury it beneath the hill that Soldier is standing on. Seriously. Your choice of tense is not immersive, it is filtering. It doesn’t make me feel anything as the reader except frustration that such a good story idea was so poorly written.
(49) Same: The single tear down the cheek has been (*oh god, it's contagious*) cliche since the old littering commercials of the ‘70s. Having no tears or an undefined number would have been better.
(50) Forty-third paragraph: Wrong tense. “Eighteen’s death is the last straw.”
(51) Forty-fifth paragraph: only one “long” needed.
(52) Same: “…he was a boy.”
(53) Same: Comma after “family.”
(54) Forty-sixth paragraph: Delete had. All three of them. I almost made this three separate points just to emphasize it.
(55) Forty-seventh paragraph: replace “sides to the war, fighting” with “those who fight.”
(56) Same: Misspelling: “in the,” not “int he.” Could probably invert the sentence and delete the conjunction, too. “In the end, it’s all the same.”
(57) Same: “the pacifists.” You've called them lowercase pacifists to this point, changing now is wrong.
(58) Forty-eighth paragraph: delete “had.”
(59) Same: replace “had been the wrong call to make” with “was the wrong call.”
(60) Forty-ninth paragraph: “the empty” to “empty”
(61) Fiftieth paragraph: Period after first “stop” instead of comma.
(62) Same: Delete had. “They fought for no reason.”
(63) Same: Delete had. “Their intentions were to win the war, but what was it?”
(64) Fifty-first paragraph: Turn it into his direct thought. Clean up the sentence. /We fought on the wrong side, and now everyone is dead./
(65) Fifty-third paragraph: delete “just slightly,”
(66) Fifty-fourth paragraph: “moment’s hesitation”
(67) Same: Delete “up.” Possibly also “off the earth.”
(68) Fifty-fifth paragraph: I think “a valley” instead of “the valley.”
(69) Fifty-sixth paragraph: Turn it into two sentences (replace “, and” with a period)..
(70) Fifty-seventh paragraph: could be more meaningful if it was a personal thought. /But I’ve lost, too./
(71) Fifty-eighth paragraph: Rain? What rain? The only rain mentioned non-metaphorically has been ash. Should be mentioned earlier.
(72) Fifty-ninth paragraph: Second “up” is repetitive.
(73) Sixtieth paragraph: The previously unmentioned “harsh weather” could easily be deleted without changing a thing.
(74) Sixty-first paragraph: While the intention of the sentence/paragraph is poignant and a good ending, the actual verbiage is poor. Needs to be rewritten much stronger.

Reply

James Scott
21:49 Oct 10, 2025

I understand the fear here - first time entries winning and being shortlisted ignites the suspicion of bots / AI that are everywhere now. But I think if that were the case you wouldn’t find any grammatical errors at all. Perhaps it really is people putting their best foot forward and hitting a nerve with the judge reading. I do agree there should be more clarity on what that looks like - is it technical ability or does it rely on how it makes the judge feel? How many judges are there and does it depend who you get? Does the guest editor read every story or do they get a shortlist? What if your judge really hates your genre? Is that fair? These are all questions for the organisers though, not the winner. I doubt reedsy admins read all the comments. Having won twice myself, I know it’s possible, and I tend to be able to tell if my story has a chance these days by judging its quality myself.

Congratulations to Caroline - don’t let these comments take away that winning feeling. I enjoyed the story and the message of it was clear while being emotionally compelling. It spoke to many and told a good story. Don’t stop writing.

Reply

Tamsin Liddell
02:33 Oct 11, 2025

James:

If you think I'm queued about this being AI, you clearly didn't read what I said.

I am concerned that Reedsy fixed the competitive so that a predetermined person who did not write anything best the best submission won.

I am concerned that—yet again!—someone whose sole contribution to this site is a winning submission.

No likes.
No comments.
No follows.

In fact, they created their account no earlier than October 1st.

In fact:
This story is shoen as posted on October 4th. Except the deadline was October 3rd.
Which means that it was posted after deadline.
So how is that possible?

Maybe it's showing her local time instead of mine? Perhaps.
But there are issues. And Reedsy needs to be held accountable.

Reply

Jessie Laverton
10:18 Oct 11, 2025

Hey Tamsin,
If I read your comment as a beginner writer I would feel absolutely crushed. Critique is always hard to take, even when you want it because you know you need it to progress. I learnt a bunch that way, a bit on here and mostly on the critique circle, and I'm thankful for it, but the harsh ones were always hard to swallow. And yours here is unsolicited so I guess that makes it harder.

HOWEVER I agree with everything you somewhat harshly said. After reading the judge's description of this story, I came to read it expecting something very different, and I was confused by the end of the first paragraph.

This piece reminds me very much of my own first pieces, when I thought I was writing something so original and evocative, but I was actually just spelling everything out to my readers in a melodramatic tone (some of them are still on here lol). And, like you, I don't claim to have mastered anything now either. I am, however, fascinated in the process of learning to write, and I love to come on here and see people at different stages of that learning journey.

And I agree with you when you say that to some extent the judge "lied" to Caroline, and the reason why I want to comment here is because I'm not sure that that does her any favours. To start with, it unfairly places her at the centre of this kind of discussion, which must be very unpleasant, but like you say, certain things have to be said.
But more importantly, I don’t think it serves her. If any of my first pieces had won a contest, I would have patted myself on the back and thought I had arrived already.
So I'd like to say to Caroline, some of the criticism on here is harsh, but don't let that make you stop. Also don't read too much into the win. Enjoy it, but keep learning. At the very least, go on websites like critiquecircle.com where you can connect with other writers and really learn from them.

I also agree with you Tamsin when you say that Reedsy owes us some clarity and explanations. So okay, this piece struck a chord with the judge. Great. Of course there is a huge subjective element in judging a contest like this. But is that really enough? What about showcasing the people (and there are plenty of them on here), who have devoted years to perfecting their craft and honouring a literary heritage?

I also want to talk about the fact that some of the comments on here are calling you a troll or saying that reedsy is not here to "shred" stories. I do agree that we should always be kind in the feedback we give, BUT we should also be honest and constructive if needed. And you are very right that something needs to be said about this story winning, because while that is very nice for the winner, it is rather frustrating for all the more skilled and experienced writers on here, who take the platform seriously. Where's the niceness there? They might just end up leaving. There is nothing "nice" about an unfair win.

If we cannot be honest and constructive, then a platform like this becomes no more than just another kind of social media, with people liking each other's stuff just to get likes back, commenting 'well done' just to interact for the sake of interacting... I'm absolutely not saying that all the likes and comments on here are insincere. I've had a load of really useful comments on my pieces, and I always appreciate the likes. But I do sometimes sense a social media type attitude, and when negative but constructive comments are dismissed as "not nice" or worse, then I feel it diminishes the potential of the platform.

Anyway best of luck to everybody.

Reply

Tamsin Liddell
13:34 Oct 10, 2025

Someone I trust said my critique might be too harsh. While I did list positives, they're lost in the mountain of other stuff. So I'll consolidate here.

*) You have a great idea. It's an original story, and it is worth being told.
*) I like the setting you've developed, though in my opinion it's very metaphoric and hyperbolic. But there's nothing wrong with that.
*) The fifteenth paragraph ("There had been an agreement once") is strong as heck. It sets the story and the mood and everything perfectly. Maybe not first-paragraph worthy, but definitely near the start. This was the lede.
*) You are strong with visual descriptions.
*) The plot arc is decent.
*) The ending has potential to be excellent.

Reply

02:32 Oct 11, 2025

I want to start this by saying whether this story deserved to win the award for this prompt is besides the point to my following comment.

Your “no sour grapes” comment does not hold water as your original reply to this writer’s post reeks of jealousy, no matter if you submitted a story to this prompt or not. Additionally, you do not have to try and drag down other new writers because you feel that this story did not deserve to win. Why try and knock new writers down a peg? How do you expect this platform to grow? And how do you expect writers to respect your opinion when you present your “criticism” as some nit-picky slog of text with anything remotely appearing as critiques buried under heaps of pessimism and negativity. Someone who claims to be a poor writer does not get to pass such a scathing review without having any hardware or the track record to add validity to your statements. You can provide criticism without spitting venom from your mouth, and you can do so without cutting the legs out from under someone who is trying a new hobby. It might actually get you farther as a writer(and a human)to not be such a bitter person. You should perhaps read the first paragraph from your only creative writing post on your profile, and take a page from the book of your characters who “enjoy helping others write” , as it is perfectly evident you don’t enjoy reading another writer’s story and providing constructive feedback as much as you enjoy trying to make them feel bad about something they put time into.

Reply

Tamsin Liddell
02:37 Oct 11, 2025

You created an anonymous account just to say this? So brave.

Reply

03:00 Oct 11, 2025

Your screen name on here isn’t even your real name either, as you claim on one of your many posts dedicated to griping about this website. For someone so disappointed in the way it is run you sure spend a lot of time on here. Additionally, you didn’t address any of my critiques towards you in my original comment. Attacking the person behind the comment rather than addressing the content of the comment is an indicator of an inferior debater. If you wish to address any of that then please do so, if not I will no longer give you the satisfaction of providing you the validation you are seeking by replying to your vitriolic message. Have a great life!

Reply

13:53 Oct 10, 2025

I'm going to have to side with your friend on this one.
Instead of: "I'd be embarrassed", try: "Great job winning first try! Hey, here are some tips on how to improve!"
Less soul crushing and more appreciation, you know?
Otherwise I agree with the critique.

Reply

Tamsin Liddell
14:02 Oct 10, 2025

If I'm going to say that the story is not even one of the top ten stories submitted, then congratulating someone for winning with something that is completely undeserving would be far worse.

I would rather be told the truth than fluffed.

Reply

Rhed Flagg
16:10 Oct 10, 2025

I'm in total agreement with you on this story, T.L.

This wouldn't pass muster at all in ANY writing class past kindergarten.

This story, among NUMEROUS others from first time entrants/winners is a sad piece of writing.

It's like they're not even trying to hide the facts anymore.

I'm with you on the "no sour grapes" as well. I haven't paid to enter my stories and give up the rights to my stories in weeks.

Reply

Jessie Laverton
10:27 Oct 11, 2025

Great letter in your bio Rhed.

Do you share your work anywhere else now? I'd be interested.

"Kindergarten" is possibly a gross exaggeration btw.

Reply

RBE | Illustrated Short Stories | 2024-06

Bring your short stories to life

Fuse character, story, and conflict with tools in Reedsy Studio. All for free.