“This is Fleet Captain Ralston. All ships report in.”
I’m not a fan of technology. Let me rephrase that. I’m okay with technology in general, what with it currently being the only thing between me and the vacuum of space. However, I think that even a cursory glance through human history shows that, rather than solving our problems, it just lets us be humans faster and more efficiently than ever before. Sometimes that’s good, I suppose. Other times, not so much.
Take for instance, my current situation. I’m the commanding officer of Earth’s first fleet of spaceships equipped with faster-than-light technology. It’s officially called the Wallace Drive, I guess after the person who invented it or something. I don’t suppose it really matters. The troops are just calling it the faster-than-light drive. Or in one case I overheard in the corridors the “Oh Jesus! I didn’t sign up for this!” drive.
Saying that morale is at an all-time low is quite the understatement. Being guinea pigs will do that to you. Especially when being a guinea pig has the possibility of reducing you to a smear of paste on the nearest bulkhead if the slightest thing goes wrong.
I had, of course, raised these concerns with the Admiralty. Admiral Butler had responded with a message that consisted simply of a copy of the contract for enlisted personnel and officers, with the sections about disobeying orders and going AWOL highlighted. I got the message. I wondered about adding a pay grade for crash test dummies.
In theory, this should be a good thing. The galaxy is essentially open to us now. We can travel to the stars in hours and days instead of years and centuries now. Humanity can expand out and colonize. We can finally ensure the survival of the species. I should feel pretty good about all these new possibilities. Manifest destiny! In space!
In practice, things are already swirling down the galactic toilet bowl. Apparently, our space station at Epsilon Eridani is having some issues. I don’t have all the details, but it sounds like someone there murdered the undercover agent that was supposed to be keeping tabs on the place for Mother Earth. Apparently it’d been a John Doe cold case for ten years or so, but his transmitter kept sending the usual “status normal” signal, so nobody had bothered to follow up. Then some disgraced detective and weird little IT girl started digging. The detective figured it out and sent a message on the transmitter, not realizing that it allowed for instant communication, skipping the ten light year transmit time. One little gem we hadn’t shared with the colonies yet.
I’d been to the space station before. Epsilon Eridani L3-1, or Hinterlands, as the locals called it. A bit bare bones, but overall a decent enough place to live. Germany had contributed heavily to its funding, back when national borders were still a thing. It gave it a heavy European feel and an ungodly amount of sausages. I hadn’t expected to go back, since it was a twenty year commute. Yet here we are.
Earth is irate. Again, I’m not sure about the details, which really seems like something that should be shared with the leader of the expedition force, but it sounds like the man who was president or chancellor or whatever they call it there is the guy who murdered our agent. So instead of the training maneuvers we were scheduled for, in the general direction of Proxima Centauri, we’re throwing it in reverse and heading to the Hinterlands to take control.
Isn’t that lovely. We have a fancy-schmancy new way to explore the galaxy and the first thing we’re going to do is go invade someplace that may or may not have had it coming. Again the details are really skimpy at this point. I can't really emphasize that enough. Officially, I’m being told this is a peace-keeping mission. That’s probably true. We’ll keep the peace all right and make sure no one else gets any of it.
“All ships report ready, Fleet Captain,” the voice of my executive officer, Commander Darreaux, interrupts my thoughts. He has voiced concerns about the new technology as well. Like me, he’s concerned about Earth using it to impose their will on the unwilling. His background is in political science if I recall correctly. He has privately raised concerns with me that Earth is violating the rights of the stations and colonies if we assume control. Most are technically considered autonomous under international (interstellar?) law. He’s concerned that our orders are illegal.
He may be right. I’m a sailor though, not a lawyer. I go where I’m told and do what I’m ordered. Unless it’s a clear-cut case of illegal/immoral, there’s not much I can do. The Admiral’s political adjunct, Lieutenant Commander Bryant is here to make sure of that.
Darreaux and Bryant have a strange relationship. They’ve known each other since their days at Dayton Island, but don’t seem to agree on anything. They’ll fight tooth and nail on just about any given subject and then just put it all aside and go have dinner. Right now though, I can feel the animosity bubbling over between them.
“Thank you Commander,” I reply. “Stand by for launch orders from Earth.”
“Aye sir,” Darreaux responds.
Lieutenant Commander Bryant straightens up a little bit in what I assume he thought was an action to make him look taller and more dignified. It honestly just looked like he had a dryer sheet stuck in his uniform. But, he’d won. He and Darreaux had had it out in my office, off the record, before all this. They’d laid out their arguments. Darreaux’s was that the Earth government had no right to interfere with the internal affairs of stations and colonies in other systems, while Bryant’s essentially was that “Nuh-uh! Do too have the right!” Admiral Butler had very firmly confirmed that he was siding with Bryant and his eloquent argument, so here we are. I could feel the fury coming off of Darreaux in waves, just as I could feel the smug satisfaction radiating off of Bryant. To be fair, they would each be doing the opposite if the situations were reversed. Neither were above it, due to their enormous egos. It was very unbecoming of an officer I felt, but it would probably be why they would be admirals one day and I won’t be. Crewmen respond to people like me. Captains respond to people like Darreaux and Bryant, mainly because they have to.
Ultimately though, none of that changes the current situation. If I’d refused, I’d have been court martialed and someone else would be sent in. At least this way, I could keep an eye on things and try to control the situation. I’m deeply afraid that our first use of our new technology is going to result in a lot of people getting hurt. It’s never the people that deserve to get hurt though.
Oh, and I’m still blaming all this on technology. We have the ability, but I’m not sure about the wisdom. The people of the stations and colonies, didn’t tend to have much in the way of defenses. They needed all their resources to keep their people fed, clothed and to keep the lights and heat on. Military spending was a luxury that was rarely considered when you were so far out of the way that Earth didn’t even want to consider spending money to invade you. And it’s not like you had to worry about aliens invading or anything. All quiet on the galactic front.
Now the balance of power had well and truly shifted. Earth didn’t like what you’re doing, you’ll have an Earth fleet on your back doorstep before you can even dust off your weapons, assuming you hadn’t already melted them down for spare parts. We hadn’t even tried diplomacy, to my knowledge. It was one awful galactic coincidence that Earth found out about the Hinterlands situation just as we were getting ready to test things out. I’m constantly astounded at how often coincidences like that seem to crop up.
Even if everything goes right and we survive the trip, everything is going to go wrong for the people that live on the Hinterlands. Technology’ll do that to you.
“Fleet Captain,” the communications officer announces, “we have received the go-ahead from Earth.”
“Thank you Lieutenant,” I reply. “Take your seats gentlemen.”
Darreaux assumes his station and straps in. Bryant takes a chair used for visitors to the bridge. He doesn’t fix his safety straps properly. I don’t say anything. At the speeds we’ll be going, it’s not like it’ll make a difference. If something goes wrong we’ll be dead before we know.
“Give me fleet-wide,” I ordered the comm officer. She nods and I see a green blink on at my console.
“Attention all ships, this is Fleet Captain Ralston. We have clearance from Earth. All ships synchronize your flight controls with the Larson’s master computer. Set course for the Epsilon Eridani system and engage the Wallace Drive. Ralston out.”
I signal to the comm officer to cut the connection. She presses a few buttons and the green light goes out.
I take one last glance at Darreaux and Bryant. Both of them are looking a little green and I’m more than a little amused by that.
“Well gentlemen? Shall we?”
They both nod, but not very enthusiastically.
“Helm, engage!” I bark.
Time to go manifest some destiny all over some poor folks.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
However, I think that even a cursory glance through human history shows that, rather than solving our problems, it just lets us be humans faster and more efficiently than ever before. - I found this quite difficult to understand. Surely technology helps solve some problems if it helps people be faster and more efficient? I'm not saying all issues, but a lot can be aided with technology. So I would expand here on your thought process.
The story read very smoothly and logically and if I was to comment constructively, I guess my main point would lie with the first-person narrator. He seems a little too sarcastic and dramatic at times. For example, the last line comes up very often as a punchline to a scene: 'time to go [this and that] all over [this and that].' He's disgruntled and that's very obvious, which is good because the reader can gauge his stance very quickly and stay put - but perhaps there's ways to make it less obvious?
Reply
Hello, thanks for commenting. I appreciate it. Sorry about the delay in replying. It's been hectic and I'm just now getting back on track.
As to the first part, my general opinion here, which is reflected in the character's point of view can be summarized as, "It may help to understand human affairs to be clear that most of the great triumphs and tragedies of history are caused, not by people being fundamentally good or fundamentally bad, but by people being fundamentally people. - Good Omens by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman." While I like the idea that technology will solve our problems, unite humanity, etc... that is reflected in a lot of scifi, especially Star Trek, I just don't see it as realistic. Although technology advances, I don't really see any evidence that people from 100 years ago -or farther back- are really all that different than we are now when it comes right down to it. Technology just lets us do whatever it was we were going to do faster and more efficiently, for better or worse. As you point out, technology can help us be faster and more efficient, but that may or may not be a good thing, depending on what you're using the tech for. And, as Pratchett and Gaiman point out, when it comes right down to it, regardless of how advanced we are and how good our intentions, we're still human with all the good and bad that comes with that. Anyway, that's always been my take on things.
As to your second comment, I'm going to take that as a compliment. The narrator is very dramatic and sarcastic. He's based on a historical figure, who always gave me that same impression and his overall personality has quite a bit of several military friends of thrown in, who all went off to Basic and came back more than a little sarcastic and over the top. (Going out for dinner with them was quite interesting after that.) He also has a very high opinion of his own abilities. Notice how he arrogantly thinks he's going to be able to keep a lid on things if it goes wrong. A bit of a savior complex. Just the type of person who thinks everything he says is important and worth remembering, even though he's just another cog in the machine at the end of the day. I always thought that would exactly the kind of punchline he'd go out on, thinking it's clever and original. You correctly point out that that's hardly true, but he wouldn't be able to see past his own nose to realize that.
Anyway, hope all that makes sense and helps a little. Take care and have a great day!
*Sorry for the multiple replies at first. My computer felt the need to post this like 10 times for some reason.
Reply
Thanks for the clarification!
As to my main point, it really helped to see your point illustrated by the Good Omens example. To clarify on my side, I wasn't in disagreement over how technology doesn't necessarily make things better or worse all by itself and how it must be applied by humans first to decide its ultimate moral value (if any). What I meant was that the sentence which expressed it didn't seem to add up logically - 'rather than solving problems, technology lets us be faster and more efficient'. So the sentiment seems to reveal perceived negativity of being faster and more efficient in general. That in itself would be a fair enough subjective judgment to make if it's the narrator's point of view, but it would be good to elaborate since there is nothing inherently wrong with the adjectives chosen. To an average person, speed and capability are good things. I hope that makes sense.
As for the narrator, he seemed a little teenager-edgy to me at times which clashed with the plot, but that may be on purpose I'm guessing?
Reply
Hello and thanks for commenting again. Sorry about the delay again too. Been a busy week.
I agree with your point here and the sentence may or may not add up, depending on your point of view. Something that I've noticed over the years is that people tend to assume that certain things are good, when they don't necessarily need to be. People assume that speed and efficiency, etc... are good -and they certainly can be- but it all depends on what you're doing. It's a value judgement that many people seem to make, but it's a pet peeve of mine.
I saw a demotivational poster a long time ago that had a bunch of arrows -all grouped together in the same spot, very accurately- but about a foot below the bullseye. The caption said something to the effect of "Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screwup." I've always kept that in the back of my head in situations like this. But you're right, depending on your point of view, that sentence probably could have used some elaboration.
As for the narrator, I would agree with your position here as well. Most of the military people that I know, for all of their good qualities -of which there are many- they all seem to have an attitude like that, at least at times. And I don't think that it necessarily goes well with the gravity of their jobs at times. I knew a Marine chaplain once and he insisted on many occasions that the Marines he counselled were essentially overgrown children with weapons.
I would be (in this case) very happy to be proven wrong here, especially not being a military person myself, but the narrator's personality does line up with my own experiences. Whether or not that's a good thing for the story and the situation and characters in it, is another issue.
Thanks for reading again and have a great week!
Reply