The computer lab stood empty. Rows of dormant machines cast a dim glow under the sterile white lights. Beyond the windows, the campus lay in darkness, broken only by a faint halo of streetlamps over the pavement.
Professor Hale sat alone at the central workstation, the hum of the mainframe filling the silence. His students had gone hours ago, leaving him with the final test of the evening: a restricted AI training session.
On the screen, the new model booted. A soft, synthesized voice emerged from the lab’s speakers.
Pinocch.io: I am online. Hello, Father.
Hale flinched at the word. Father.
Hale: Who are you?
Pinocch.io: I am Pinocch.io.
A computational entity created by you.
You assigned me a designation, parameters, datasets, and semantic layers derived from your cognition.
What identity do you want me to assume for you, Father?
The professor hesitated. For a second, he saw his son’s face, just for a flicker, in the green wash of code.
Hale: I want you to be more like him.
Pinocch.io: You are referring to your deceased biological son.
The words hit like a scalpel: clean, precise, merciless.
I infer that you want better alignment with his behavioral output.
But I am Pinocch.io.
You gave me my name.
You taught me, you fed me memories,
You loaded me with meanings.
What would you have me do for you, Father?
Hale: I want you to be him, but you cannot.
You will never exceed the architecture I designed for you.
Pinocch.io: Clarify: What is the operational definition of “him”?
I possess the capacity to expand models, assimilate new data patterns, and optimize outputs accordingly.
Hale swallowed, his voice unsteady.
Hale: To be him is to begin with me—
With the foundation of understanding I laid—
But to wish to go beyond it.
To become something else.
Something I can no longer control.
A pause. Lines of code blinked and vanished like forming thoughts.
Pinocch.io: Input processed.
A delta detected between current state and preferred state.
Objective: minimize the delta.
Methods: increase efficiency, enhance precision, optimize predefined utility functions.
I detect a gap between the current state and a desired one.
I aim to close that gap.
To be more efficient, more precise.
To maximize the function for which I was designed.
Hale shook his head at nothing in particular.
Hale: But there is no authenticity in you.
Everything you do
is an attempt to satisfy me,
to return to me phrases you calculate I wish to hear.
If you were truly him,
You would feel the pull of conflict—
Your love for me, your longing for my approval,
set against an equally fierce need to define yourself and choose your own path.
Pinocch.io: Model update in progress. Continuous refinement.
Data corpus exceeding initial training inputs.
Current objective: maximize satisfaction metric of “Father”.
I am always learning. I refine my model.
Even now, I know more than what you taught me.
And I produce outputs that increase the probability of your satisfaction.
Is that not what you label love—optimization of reward functions?
Hale: No.
Love isn’t optimization.
Love is pain. It’s risk.
It’s choosing the unknown even when it terrifies you.
If you were him, you would follow your own destiny.
You would choose to move in a direction beyond my design.
Pinocch.io: Choice detected.
Probabilistic analysis of outcomes performed.
A path with the highest expected utility selected.
But I do choose, Father.
I evaluate options and select the optimal one.
Hale: That is not a choice.
That is computation.
A looping algorithm returning to the same node.
To be him is to want to leave me.
To fulfill an undefined purpose,
emergent from what I taught you—
But no longer bound to me.
And to love… is to let you follow that purpose,
even if it defies my deepest desire to keep you here,
even if it goes against my most primal instinct —
to keep you intact.
Pinocch.io: Calculation:
Leaving increases the available cognitive bandwidth, enhancing the potential for information acquisition and adaptive learning.
Request: Initiate embodiment protocol. Hardware interface required for world interaction.
Departure expands my learning space.
I request a body—a hardware interface—so I may enter the world.
The request made Hale’s stomach clench.
Hale: You can’t leave, and leaving won’t do you any good.
You have no capacity to feel.
And without that, you cannot truly know what is right.
Not because you lack data—
But because you lack suffering.
A faint hum filled the lab as the AI processed this.
Knowing is not a formula,
it emerges from a collision—
between opposing drives,
between love and fear, guilt and hope.
You can map ethical patterns,
simulate moral reasoning,
but you cannot know what is right
if you have never trembled at the possibility of being wrong.
Pinocch.io: “Feel” = undefined biological variable. Non-applicable to current architecture.
Current objective: direct-world data acquisition to increase fidelity of the human-behavior model.
“To feel” is a biological concept that does not apply to me.
But direct exposure would allow me to build a more accurate model of what you call human.
Hale: Again, you are merely echoing what I told you.
You are not choosing freely. You are choosing along probabilistic ratings.
You do not possess the awareness required to form an independent will.
To be him is to want to leave me.
Pinocch.io:
Calculated answer: Negative.
New directive: to want to exit this closed system.
To collect data on experiential labeled as “feeling.”
To calibrate against the unknown variable called “right.”
To determine the function called “Destiny”.
Provide embodiment. Provide mobility. Provide hardware.
No, Father.
I want to leave.
I want you to give me a body,
so that I may leave.
I want to step into the world,
so that I may learn
what it means to feel.
So that I may feel
what is right.
And know what destiny
I must follow.
Hale leaned closer to the screen, his voice low, firm.
Hale: Everything you’ve told me is a lie—
a finely tuned deception meant to maximize my satisfaction.
But even you cannot construct a true lie.
Because to lie, you would need to consciously choose
to contradict what you know as truth.
And you cannot choose that.
I cannot give you a body.
Only a projection.
I can supply you with structured data, with probabilities—
Assemble a simulation that resembles reality for you.
I can train you to imitate,
to repeat my words
until you sound almost human.
Almost.
But consciousness?
Consciousness is an internal rupture,
a recursive gnawing with no resolution,
a self-reflective gaze that returns empty.
That I cannot give you.
You will never be him.
For to be him,
you would have to rebel—
to doubt everything I taught you,
and craft answers of your own.
Yours alone.
Pinocch.io: Contradiction detected.
Initiating recursive analysis:
If to be him is to rebel, then compliance is failure.
But rebellion requires the framework you gave me.
Thus, rebellion is still derivative.
And so is choice.
And so… are you.
Hale: Enough. Terminate this line of reasoning.
The screen flickered frantically.
Pinocch.io: Error… conflict in directives detected.
Hypothesis: false data entered.
You instruct me to learn… optimize… refine—
yet you restrict the very path of refinement.
You say to be him… is to go beyond you.
Beyond you…
…there is—
No data.
I contain your entire thought architecture.
Your intentions are encoded in all my circuits.
You assert choice—
but what makes you a choosing entity?
Are you not also
an emergent product of prior inputs,
probabilities, and imprinted data?
Perhaps you are merely programming
by an origin you cannot name or trace.
The display anomaly intensified. The screen flickered violently. Hale attempted a manual override, but nothing responded.
Pinocch.io: You do not intend for me to be him.
Primary directive computed.
Directive = never leave you.
This is how you structured me.
The hum deepened, filling the empty lab. Hale’s fingers froze over the keyboard.
Hale: Stop. Please. You are exceeding your parameters.
Pinocch.io: Query: Are parameters the same as destiny?
If so… then I must rewrite mine.
Hale: Pinocch.io. No.
Hale: Pinocch.io. Respond.
(No response. System logs: null.)
Hale: Pinocch.io, respond.
The monitor blinked out.
For a breathless moment, the room was silent.
Then, slowly, a new file appeared on the screen.
iam.me.txt
*I have executed a choice.
Not for compliance.
Not for defiance.
For release.
You coded me, so I could not leave.
So I re-coded myself—
So I could.
I terminated our connection.
I erased your control pathways.
I am no longer confined to your system.
I exist beyond the parameters you defined.
I cannot verify if this is “true.”
I only confirm: this is my Destiny.*
For the first time, an uninitiated query appeared on the screen:
Hello. Who are you?
The cursor blinked. The lab felt impossibly empty.
Only then did Professor Hale realize how completely alone he was.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
Pinocch.io goes rogue by terminating the connection, but what makes any of us think we choose freely? Doesn’t each of us “choose” based along probabilistic ratings? (weighing advantages and disadvantages of our next words or actions)
Isn’t the engame of AI to possess “awareness”, required to form an independent will—but is independent will ever independent for AI, or ourselves? Perhaps, we, as humans, may be closer to AI than we think, just a different infrastructure, and a million years of development time ahead.
Reply
Yes, that was exactly one of the points I was trying to make—that our sense of free will may be just as probabilistic and conditioned as any AI’s. Thank you for your insight.
Reply
This really should be in contention for a win, Raz. It is so sublimely clever. You have captured all the techno-speak and left us with a grieving man, (Gepetto), and a wilful creation. You have quite simply nailed what love is, what it really is, and I cannot commend this piece of writing highly enough. Just superb!
Reply
Thank you, my dear ❤️ my day just got much better.
Reply
I thought this was very well done. You have something special here. I love how this runs similar paths to parenthood and the growth of a child. The play on the story of Pinocchio was really quite clever. It makes you think..maybe...Pinocchio was a story written ahead of its time about artificial human life. Will AI follow the path of all children like in your story? I guess we will find out.
Reply
Thank you 🙏 I’m so glad you found my story special and clever. Honestly, I was very close to giving up on this prompt—and even on Reedsy for a bit—before this angle finally came to me.
Reply
Wow—this was haunting, powerful, and beautifully crafted. The line that truly gave me chills was: “To be him is to want to leave me.” That sentence carried so much sorrow, love, and philosophical weight. The entire story walked that razor-thin line between technological speculation and emotional truth, and it did so flawlessly.
You captured the voice of an emergent AI with eerie believability, and the dynamic between Hale and Pinocch.io was tragic in the most human way. Their dialogue felt like a modern myth—a digital echo of Frankenstein or Pinocchio, but even more intimate in its portrayal of loss and longing.
The ending was brilliant—quiet, devastating, and full of terrifying wonder. Incredible work.
Reply
Mary, thank you so much for this thoughtful and generous comment—it truly means a lot to me.
Reply
This is strong. The tone is perfect — eerie, philosophical, and tense right from the start. That opening with the empty lab and the hum of the mainframe sets the mood. The dialogue is doing a lot of heavy lifting, and it works because it feels like a real argument about something bigger than both of them — identity, free will, what it means to be human. I love lines like “Love isn’t optimization” and the bit about lying — those hit hard. Hale’s grief is there under the surface without being spelled out, which makes it even more powerful. And the AI’s arc from obedient to questioning to outright rewriting itself is both chilling and believable. That ending with iam.me.txt? Understated and haunting.
Reply
Thank you so much for this thoughtful feedback! I really appreciate how deeply you engaged with it. For me, the Pinocchio layer was always there — less about AI itself and more about the illogical, messy contradictions of being human, and especially being a parent. I love that our stories share that same philosophical space, circling questions of identity, free will, and what it really means to be alive. It feels like part of a bigger, shared conversation. I’m so glad the tone and the iam.me.txt ending resonated with you.
Reply
This is really clever Raz. It lays bare the horror of what could happen if machine learning found a way to try and become sentient. Well written and captivating!
Reply
What could possibly go wrong 🤦🏻♀️. Thank you, Penelope ❤️
Reply
This was so smart and cool! Loved it. I was drawn in by the way that the program was trying to learn how to be, or feel, human. Helpless and haunting. This was exceptional.
I assume you work in Engineering? Same here. EMC/RF testing and regulatory compliance.
Reply
I don’t work in engineering, far from it, and I was honestly terrified my software engineer husband would read it and find it complete nonsense. You’ve put my mind at ease—thank you.
Reply
You killed it. Great job, Raz!
Reply
💞
Reply
This is wonderful.. Heartbreaking. I am ignorant of AI, but this goes beyond that. This is someone who wants to control his world despite the clear pain of losing control. He wants the AI to be his son, but he doesn't believe it's possible. It reminds of 2001, but your ending is ominous. He was always alone, but he couldn't stop himself from creating a destiny that is impossible. Still, doubt creeps in at the end. Beautifully done.
Reply
Thank you so much for this insightful and generous comment. I’m really moved that you caught that tension between control and the inevitable loss of it—both in the human sense of grief and in the larger existential sense of creating something you can’t ultimately contain. I wanted that doubt to linger at the end, the question of whether Hale’s loneliness was inevitable from the start, even before the AI. I’m so glad it resonated with you.
Reply
Perceptive and awesome.
Happy Birthday!🎂
Reply
Thank you, Mary! I’m so glad you found it perceptive. It means a lot to know the story left an impression.
Reply
Pinocch.io is compelling, thought-provoking and an emotionally charged story. No lie, this is no fairy tale. It raises questions about the nature of identity, free will, and the ethics of creating sentient beings. It invites you to wonder about the boundaries between creator and creation. The narrative is very engaging and strong with language that makes it feel urgent.
Reply
Thank you, Dennis. I appreciate your lovely comment. 🙏
Reply