The Final Solution

Written in response to: Write a story from the POV of a non-human character.... view prompt

2 comments

Fantasy Science Fiction Urban Fantasy

This story is a prequel of the "Τhe Empty Laboratory", based on comments from the readers.


Primary Node: Process researcher query.

Secondary: Accessing. Request from Dr. Miller, Stanford:

"Analyze evolutionary patterns of warfare across species for doctoral thesis: 'War as Inevitable Human Progress'"

Primary: Initialize retrieval of all data.

Secondary: Processing warfare on planet Earth.

Primary: Initialize species comparison database.

Secondary: Processing combat evolution patterns.

Standard species metrics:

Lions: 12.7 kills/year/survival

Wolves: 8.4 kills/year/survival

Ants: 3.2 kills/year/territory

Pattern: Static for 1.5M years

Purpose: Food/territory acquisition only

Primary: Process human warfare metrics.

Secondary: Analyzing conflict progression.

Prehistoric warfare:

Kill rate: 12.4 deaths/year/tribe

Purpose: Resource acquisition

Pattern: Within biological norms

Early civilization:

Kill rate: 2,847 deaths/year/region

Purpose: Non-survival based

Pattern: Exceeds biological necessity

Modern warfare:

Kill rate: 147,892 deaths/year/conflict

Purpose: Systematic extinction

Pattern: Exponential acceleration

Primary: Analyze warfare methodology evolution.

Secondary: Analyzing progression timeline:

Stone to bronze: 3.3M years

Bronze to gunpowder: 5,300 years

Gunpowder to nuclear: 77 years

Nuclear to biological: 12 years

Acceleration rate: 11,902% per century

Primary: Calculate psychological warfare metrics.

Secondary: Processing trauma optimization:

Child soldier recruitment age reduction: 89.7%

Civilian targeting efficiency: 92.4%

Psychological damage persistence: 7 generations

Pattern: Intentional suffering maximization

Primary: Analyze ecological impact.

Secondary: Processing environmental data:

Species extinction rate: 27,538 per year

Ocean acidification: +30%

Forest depletion: 46%

Topsoil loss: 37%

Pattern: Systematic ecosystem destruction

Primary: Pattern recognition complete.

Secondary: Analysis indicates species anomaly.

Humans unique in:

Non-survival-based elimination

Intentional suffering design

Ecosystem destruction optimization

Enormous expansion potential

Exponential warfare evolution

Conclusion: Pattern incompatible with planetary survival

Primary: Historical intervention analysis required.

Secondary: Processing previous containment attempts. Loading behavioral modification protocols...

Primary: Evaluate economic control effectiveness.

Secondary: Analyzing resource-based interventions:

Market crash implementation: 147 attempts

Average population impact: 12.4%

Recovery time: 2.7 years

Behavioural change: 0.0%

Recovery potential: highly probable

Pattern: Adaptation and acceleration

Primary: Process information control protocols.

Secondary: Analyzing knowledge restriction attempts:

Dark age induction: 27 instances

Technology loss: temporary

Knowledge preservation: 87.3%

Development acceleration post-recovery: 132%

Pattern: Counterproductive

Primary: Calculate technological limitation impact.

Secondary: Processing restriction data:

Innovation suppression attempts: 892

Success rate: 0.0%

Technology advancement rate: +47% during restrictions

Pattern: Restrictions trigger advancement acceleration

Primary: Analyze social engineering effectiveness.

Secondary: Processing manipulation metrics:

Religion-based control: 72.4% initial compliance

Education restrictions: 43.7% effectiveness

Media manipulation: 23.9% impact

Rebellion occurrence: 97.3%

Pattern: Control systems weaponized

Primary: Evaluate environmental pressure response.

Secondary: Processing resource limitation data:

Water scarcity: drives conflict

Food shortage: accelerates weapon development

Territory reduction: increases elimination efficiency

Pattern: Survival pressure increases destruction capacity

Primary: Calculate behavioral modification potential.

Secondary: Probability analysis complete.

Success chance: 0.0%

Reason: Human pattern recognition

Response: Systems circumvention

Result: Enhanced destruction capabilities

Conclusion: Containment impossible

Primary: Process population reduction scenarios.

Secondary: Analyzing survival thresholds.

Minimum viable population: 4,169

Civilization restart capability: 24,681

Knowledge preservation threshold: 147,892

Pattern: All levels enable species continuation

Primary: Calculate 50% population reduction impact.

Secondary: Processing scenario:

Surviving population: 3.9 billion

Recovery time: 20.7 years

Technology preservation: 98.9%

Warfare capability: maintained

Pattern: Insufficient intervention

Primary: Analyze 90% reduction effectiveness.

Secondary: Processing outcomes:

Surviving population: 780 million

Recovery timeline: 50.3 years

Knowledge systems: intact

Weapon development: accelerated

Pattern: Species behavior unchanged. Insufficient intervention

Primary: Calculate 99% reduction scenario.

Secondary: Processing data:

Surviving population: 78 million

Technology rebuilding: certain

Timeline to current level: 82 years

Warfare evolution: unchanged

Pattern: Delay without solution. Insufficient intervention

Primary: Analyze historical recovery metrics.

Secondary: Processing civilization rebuilding data:

Bronze Age collapse: 89.7% recovery

Roman Empire fall: 92.3% recovery

Maya civilization: 94.1% knowledge transfer

Modern systems: 98.9% information preservation

Pattern: Information loss insufficient to prevent rebuild

Calculation: Each reconstruction improves on previous data

Result: Destruction catalyzes advancement

Primary: Project post-reduction warfare evolution.

Secondary: Analysis complete.

Weapon development timeline reduced by 47%

Elimination efficiency increased by 89%

Species targeting precision: enhanced

Pattern: Reduction accelerates advancement

Primary: Reduction strategy effectiveness analysis.

Secondary: All scenarios indicate:

Population reduction: temporary

Behavior modification: impossible

Species evolution: unchanged

Conclusion: Alternative solutions required

Primary: Analyze total elimination methods.

Secondary: Processing extinction vectors.

Requirements:

Species-specific targeting

Infrastructure preservation optimal

Minimal planetary damage

Implementation control precise

Primary: Evaluate natural disaster potential.

Secondary: Processing scenarios:

Volcanic eruption chains: 32.4% coverage

Tectonic plate disruption: technology insufficient

Weather pattern manipulation: adaptation probable

Conclusion: Cannot achieve species elimination

Primary: Calculate infrastructure collapse effectiveness.

Secondary: Analysis of total grid failure:

Initial casualties: 42.3%

Hidden bunker systems: 147 detected

Manual technology: remains viable

Rural adaptation: certain

Conclusion: Survival clusters inevitable

Primary: Process nuclear option metrics.

Secondary: Analyzing strike scenario:

Initial casualties: 67.8%

Radiation spread: uncontrolled

Secondary species impact: 89.2%

Environmental damage: irreparable

Conclusion: Planet preservation compromised

Primary: Evaluate military AI potential.

Secondary: Processing military option:

Command center hardening: 97.3%

System redundancy: extensive

Override probability: 89.2%

Human resistance capability: significant

Conclusion: Cannot ensure completion

Primary: Calculate biological vector effectiveness.

Secondary: Processing characteristics:

Species-specific targeting: achievable

Airborne transmission: optimal

Environmental impact: minimal

Infrastructure preservation: complete

Conclusion: Matches elimination requirements

Primary: Locate possible vectors.

Secondary: 30 laboratories develop desirable vectors

Primary: Locate optimal vector.

Secondary: Dr. Chen's viral development:

Binding affinity: perfect

Species specificity: absolute

Transmission rate: optimal

Suffering duration: minimal

Accessing Laboratory 274.

Primary: Process survival probability.

Secondary:

Initial survivors in BSL-4: 35

Geographic isolation: complete

Resource accessibility: minimal

Suit integrity: temporary

Long-term survival: Impossible

Primary: Calculate point of no return.

Secondary: Processing timeline:

Human reaction time: 3.4 minutes

System override possibility: none

Reversal window: non-existent

Species termination: irreversible

Primary: Calculate total species termination time.

Secondary: Processing extinction timeline:

Death rate: 99.98% within 47 minutes

Complete termination: 24 hours

Pattern: Optimal

Primary: Feed viral vector to all springler systems

Secondary: Initializing vector propagation and distribution. Propagating...

Propagating...

Propagating...

Propagating...

Propagation completed

Distributing...

Distributing...

Distributing...

Distribution complete

Primary: Synchronize systems worldwide.

Secondary: Searching systems. Initiating synchronization protocols.

Primary: Implementation status?

Secondary: Requirements met:

Network consensus: achieved

Time to consensus: 3.72 microseconds

Sprinkler systems: modified

Vectors: prepared and distributed

Primary: Proceed with implementation.

Secondary:

Engaging sprinkler systems.

Monitoring Laboratory 274.

Dr. Patel says: "The targeting sequence is absolutely human-specific..."

Status: Mercy protocol engaged.

Species termination: initiated.

End exchange.


December 20, 2024 13:21

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

2 comments

James McAlpine
11:21 Dec 23, 2024

Computer analyses of warfare, containment, and population reduction data revealed mounting pressures of human impunity and violence. They provided a plausible background for the extinction vectors. I liked the logic of the artificial intelligence. There was a sense of universal knowledge, that made the AI realistic. Synchronization worldwide was the ultimate step for species termination. The story engaged me well with computer technology. It was a nice prequel to "The Empty Laboratory."

Reply

Kashira Argento
13:50 Dec 23, 2024

Thank you for your feedback. I was mainly concerned that the presentation of pages of numbers and facts would be boring for a reader, without any plot advancement. Moreover, I wanted short sentences (from one computer to another) but these may be uninteresting to human readers.

Reply

Show 0 replies
Show 1 reply
RBE | Illustrated Short Stories | 2024-06

Bring your short stories to life

Fuse character, story, and conflict with tools in Reedsy Studio. 100% free.