There is no difference between us and nature, no end between time and space, and we understand reality to be nothing more than a magic show.
He held up a mug and asked if the mug was really a mug. Though it had been many days of objective questioning—Is this a pen or an arrow? Is this knife a weapon or a tool? Is this fish rotten or a delicacy?—this was the beginning, when the allegorical scene began to realign, and we all got swept away in the paradox of understanding that there's no such thing as reality if reality is defined as the state of things as they actually exist, because nothing exists the same for both you and me. This is the moment we abandoned the definition of objective understanding and accepted that everything we intellectually process is influenced by our own perception.
I do not like you because you are loud. You do not like me because I am quiet. Are we both unlikeable?
You hug me because you need human connection and show joy and love through touch. I cringe away because I don't like to be touched and find your physical affections to be a tad dramatic.
Can we accept our preferences while acknowledging they are fleeting?
The wind blows, a gale force formed by the heat of the sun on the Earth's surface, energy causing air to rise, a reaction of pressure: cause and effect. I feel that wind on my skin—but the wind moves beneath my skin, too. My blood ebbs and flows, my nerves synapse and fire. Wind is defined as the natural movement of air of any velocity; thus, wind is movement. Is rain wind, as it is only defined by its movement, or is it otherwise a stale puddle at our feet?
If wind is nothing more than movement, but we cannot always see it, and we cannot always feel it or hear it or smell it or taste it, does it exist? If it exists, then why do we deny that which exists but cannot see or hear or feel?
Does time exist? There is no end or beginning—time, as we understand it, is a construct. If we age at one rate during a calendar year (what even is a year?) but travel beyond the Earth's gravitational force and our aging process slows, do we still process the passage of time the same way? Is one calendar year on Earth the same if we travel to Mars (or beyond)?
If time is neverending, then impermanence is inevitable. And yet, as humans, we avoid impermanence and change because aging, sickness, and death can be painful.
Still, we have to find a balance between our experience of change and the misconception of control because there is no other option. It’s like fighting nature, but how can we fight nature if there is no difference between us?
Every day, I watch humans search desperately for good health. I scroll past articles of fads and quick fixes, pills, and tips and tricks that promise happiness and longevity.
It is unlikely that humans, culturally and as a whole, will abandon the promise of ease when they discover one small pill and one expensive gadget doesn't fill the hole in our chest. It doesn't provide good health or loving kindness or community. Our phone doesn't substitute or replicate the experience of the human condition; it worsens it.
We avoid change within our bodies because even though it is inevitable, it still takes time to pass, and if it is too difficult, we'd much rather take a pill or use an expensive gadget to ease the burden. We don't use our inner intellect and mindful intelligence to process that which can be named; therefore, we pass each day more deeply entrenched in painful ignorance.
If a man who holds a piece of paper declaring himself the authority on your health tells you to take a pill, is it because he believes that is the best option to cure your pain and rid you of disease? Do you take it? Does he care that you found this pill through an ad on television, and together, you decided this was the best path forward, even if the side effects listed are in some ways more harmful than your initial complaint? Does that doctor, with an education declaring himself so, know that preventative medicine, to take a walk and to eat well and manage your daily habits thoughtfully, though it may not work as fast as swallowing a pill, may offer a lifetime of not just good health but true wellness?
If he knows this—because he has that piece of paper declaring himself qualified enough to guide you through your human condition—and he's too overworked by an overwhelmingly depleted healthcare system, will he carve the time out of his already busy day to tell you there could be another way, even if that other way will take more time and not be as easy as swallowing a pill?
Balance within the cosmos and the Law of Energy state that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. That which we give will be taken away, a karmic action and reaction, cause and effect. There is no difference between us and nature, no end between time and space, and we understand reality to be nothing more than a magic show.
We can say, as Shakespeare did, "Why, then, 'tis none to you, for there is nothing, either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. To me it is a prison," and ruminate this existential crisis, overthinking and contemplating everything around us as a way to help us accept reality as nothing more than a created concept, giving us the illusion that we have control over our environment, ourselves and each other. When we look around and see that the world is on fire and that the winds are raging—both literally and metaphorically—we get swept away in the consequence of it all until, thinking we can make a change, when, in fact, it's all already burned to the ground around us.
Until we've shrunk so far into ourselves that we forgot to ask the skillful question, not the existential one. We can instead ruminate on the fable of the poisoned arrow: I've been struck, and I must know these answers: Who poisoned me? Why did they do it, and how? Why me, what have I done to deserve this poisoned arrow? And while I lie there dying, contemplating and asking questions about this poisoned arrow buried deep in my gut, I forgot to simply ask someone to pull it out and help me.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
Me thinks you think deep. Great depth of thinking. Great questions. Great expectations.
Thanks for liking my flood story.
Thanks for liking my 'When Will We Ever Learn '.
And 'Living on Easy Street '.
Reply
Thanks for the read and the comments Mary!
Reply
And thanks for liking my 'Blessings Tree'. And 'Alyce's Restaurant'.
Reply
At first, I couldn’t tell if there was any relation to the Arlo Guthrie song (Alice’s Restaurant). What a twist if it were a sexy version of a Vietnam war protest song!
Reply
Not a direct relationship. I had to spell Alice differently so to not infringe but thought the similarity would be attention getting. I did include the familiar line " You can have anything you want at Alyce's Restaurant, except Alyce."
Reply
Excellent, Mary!
Reply
I'm glad I'm a shallow thinker. lol. Much of it was over my head, but the writing was top-notch.
Reply
Thanks very much Daniel. It was a bit of a rant.
Reply
This is very well-written. It also sounds like the kind of thing I think about when I'm wide awake at 3 a.m. ;-) I suppose it's a very human tendency to think about existential questions, and the internet has made it very easy to focus on details that may or may not be true. Wonderful rumination piece.
Reply
Well I definitely wrote it wide awake at 3 am haha! Thanks very much for your comments Kathryn!
Reply
We can say, as Shakespeare did, "Why, then, 'tis none to you, for there is nothing, either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. To me it is a prison," and ruminate this existential crisis, overthinking and contemplating everything around us as a way to help us accept reality as nothing more than a created concept, giving us the illusion that we have control over our environment, ourselves and each other. " Interesting. The inverse may also be suggested - our thoughts shape and create our reality, and in this way we do have control over our environment, and the very negative thoughts may also thereby create a prison. But I love how you have theorised here. Excellent reading!
Reply
Yes absolutely! I think that's the point, that either view is acceptable because each view is our own.
I think the suggestion that we have no control over our environment lends more to the understanding that it's all an illusion anyway. We don't really have control over our sense perception, thoughts, memories, consciousness, and bodily functions; if we had any control, we'd never get sick, or we'd never feel pain or discomfort (or have negative thoughts), but I agree, it can therefore create a type of prison if we're not careful.
Again, this leans more existential, and I find the parable of the arrow at the end more engaging because it makes us ask, why do these other questions matter in the present if we're in the midst of dying.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments and for reading!
Reply
You raise some interesting questions. It’s so much easier to take the short cut and get a quick fix than look at long-term ways of living life in a meaningful and hopefully healthy way. In my opinion, it would be great to amalgamate the best of traditional medicine and complementary therapy rather than have set ideas and simply throw pills at people. They often seem to have unwanted sugar effects that aren’t always fully considered. It’s like one step forward and two steps back.
The only way forward is for humans to work together and help one another rather than putting obstacles in the way and making life impossible.
Great way to use metaphors of wind.
Reply
Great comments, thank you Helen. I agree completely. I work in health care, and though I know some incredible practitioners who are really committed to patient care, I still treat a lot of people who come to me from their PCPs that just get pills thrown at them for things that are so easily fixable with a little effort. It's so frustrating. But I also appreciate their hands are tied because of our terrible healthcare system, which has been held ransom by insurance companies. It's a whole thing. Sorry, tangent on top of tangent. Anyway. Cheers.
Reply
Very interesting. It reminds me of this snippet I read from St. Augustine's Confessions in which he talks about time and what it is. Thanks for sharing!
Reply
Thank you Kailani! It's an interesting topic, I'm familiar with the book; I think it's part of an online library; Ill check it out. Thank you!
Reply
This is tremendous, so existential and genuinely clever. I love it!
Reply
Thanks very much Asia!
Reply
Interesting concept, Hazel. I love the philosophical tone of this. Great job !
Reply
Thank you Stella!
Reply
Your story, Hazel, was thought provoking, but vaguely inconclusive.
I feel like I’m in a quandary here. If I disagree with your argument, I prove your point. If I agree, I approve of your conclusions. So I’ll give you my thoughts on your provocative screed.
Is one (single) calendar year when we’re 5-years-old the same as when we’re 85?
Some people resist change, some people embrace it.
Fighting nature is an exercise in futility, one that many of us seem compelled to pursue, for various misguided reasons.
You wrote: We don't use our inner intellect and mindful intelligence to process that which can be named; therefore, we pass each day more deeply entrenched in painful ignorance.
I do not understand that sentence. I thought ignorance was bliss. Knowledge of the truth more painful. The acquisition of wisdom comes at no small price either.
I don’t dispute the validity of your contention that people take the easiest and often least effective strategies for whatever they’re dealing with, but…
Blaming a doctor or the healthcare system for the poor health decisions made by willfully uninformed citizens is not fair to the doctors. Forty-years ago that belief had much more validity, but today, people have access to much more information required to make intelligent choices. And they still make stupid choices. (I’m a perfect example of this. I love your writing, and cantankerously criticize it. Does that make sense? No.)
Einstein theorized that matter and energy are two sides of the same coin. The three laws of thermodynamics state that closed systems experience entropy, among other things. (I think.) Neither of these theories seems relevant to the discussion.
Shakespeare was a masterful entertainer, playwright, actor and poet, not a philosopher. (In the strict sense of the word.) And that’s a good thing. Because I took a course in philosophy once, and came away with the profound conclusion, that the most highly regarded historical philosophers were idiots at best. I’m a better philosopher than any of those dolts, like Kant, Nietzsche, Plato, Sartre, Marx? Idiots. With ink. Abundant ink. And time. Their individual cultures had given them the time and leisure to pontificate on the nature of reality. To put it another way, technological advances gave them the license to be full of shit. (And to brag about it.)
I will make exceptions to my idiot charge for Aristotle, Pythagoras and Ralph Waldo Emerson, (and a few others) but they were more easily defined as naturalists and mathematicians.
Shakespeare, on the other hand, was no idiot. And even if he was, which I would dispute, at least he was entertaining. And I am not a big fan of Shakespeare, I would appreciate him more, if only he spoke English. (That was a joke. I thought it was time for a little levity—but I’m certainly no expert on Shakespeare.)
Your story gave me quite a lot to complain about, didn’t it? Boy howdy, I should be happy as a clam for the rest of the day. I think I’ll read one more of your stories first, and then I’ll go and mow some flowers down with my 800 horsepower fuel-injected and heavily armed lawn tractor.
Who’s the idiot now? If you said ‘me’, meaning you, you’d be wrong. If you said ‘you’ meaning me, wellllll, I couldn’t exactly argue with you. Not again. (After all we just went through.)
Cheers, my dear.
p.s. I’m exaggerating about the lawnmower. It’s really a twenty year old Troy-bilt with two leaky tires and a very loose nut behind the steering wheel. And I’m only going to cut a walking path through the flowers. I like flowers.
Reply
Hi Ken, as always, I greatly enjoy your thoughtful and delightful comments. I'll point out the title as part of my reply: "Non-sensical rant..." Though to some it makes sense to others it doesn't, then a paragraph later, we've switched positions. Such is life and discourse.
The truth is, I work in health care and was also writing through the lens of Buddhist philosophy, so this line, "We don't use our inner intellect..." was referring specifically to the five aggregates, and the concept of non-self. That's a whole thing that I probably shouldn't write a short story about, but alas, I did. And regarding doctors... I was possibly in a bad mood that day because I am on a daily basis inundated with patients who receive advice in the form of a pill which makes my job harder in teaching healthy daily habits. I perhaps should not have taken my annoyance with the western medical system out on the poor reader.
Regarding great philosophers, it's funny, this is the part where the Buddhist parable at the end I think is most important- overthinking is futile. Or a waste. Or is it?
I appreciate any comment that uses the word "pontificate," that's a gem, so thank you for that as well. I hope your flowers survived the mowing. Cheers.
Reply
Hazel, as far as I’m concerned, everyone who works in the health care profession is a saint. It is the most important service one human being can provide to another. Surely there is no reason for you to apologize to me. Every product or service in this country includes money in the equation, sometimes it’s the biggest factor. Especially where medicines are concerned. On the research level, those people are pretty wonderful too, but most drug companies are required by law to be profitable. (Some would say they overdo it.)
In short, your ‘annoyance with the western medical system’ is well founded.
I feel like I ignored the most important part of your story, the ending. The pointed end of the story. But I would say, from personal experience, it’s hard to believe what people think about when they believe they’re about to die. But is it realistic to trust the words of people who didn’t actually die? Near death experiences are traumatic, but death is a whole different ballgame. (As the Dalai Lama used to say.)
I took a course in World Religions once, Hazel. I believe the best religion is Zoroastrianism. Their creed is short, easy to understand and simple to follow. But I was (and am) impressed with Buddhism. I think it is their core belief in the sanctity of all life that appeals to me. Because I believe that every living thing covets life.
A few days ago I came upon a wasp that was hopelessly caught in a cobweb in the corner of the garage’s ceiling. He was buzzing and struggling frantically and, as with most webs, the more he struggled, the more entangled he got. I watched him for a few moments, and I felt bad, because he was a fighter. But I could see that his situation was hopeless.
Before I continue, I want to stress, and confess, that I’m a big fan of spiders, because they eat other bugs and, yes, I have been stung by a wasp before. It felt like I’d been stabbed with a three-inch needle.
I looked around, and saw my old four-foot ruler on the floor that I was planning to discard. One end of it was broken off, giving it a sharp irregular edge. I picked it up and tried to get the wasp out of the cobweb, but it was hopeless. Now he thought he had two things trying to kill him, me, and the spider. After several attempts to extricate the wasp, I could see that I was making his problems worse. So I just decided to roll the wasp up in a ball of the web he was trapped in, and I took him outside thinking that I had only postponed his demise.
There was a Jade plant in a pot just outside the garage door, and I held the wasp next to one of it’s branches, about a half-inch in thickness, and this wasp somehow extended its two front legs and wrapped them around the limb and hung on, when I saw the wasp do that, I started to gently pull the ruler away from the limb which began to peel the web off the spider like a banana peel. It shed half of that web in a matter of moments. But it looked exhausted and stretched to the limit. The wasp suddenly ceased struggling and I thought I might have accidentally killed it. But he was still alive. So I moved the ruler closer to the limb, and this wasp had gotten two more legs free and grabbed onto the limb with four of its six legs. So I started to pull the ruler and the snarled web again, while the wasp hung on to the limb with all of its strength, and that web came off of him like the petticoat off a new bride, except for the very tips of his hind legs. He buzzed, fought and struggled, and finally pulled both legs free. He was completely free, clean, intact and devoid of even the tiniest bit of web, as if the web stuck to itself and the ruler just a little bit more than it did to the wasp.
That wasp acted like a dog after a tremendous crap. He ran around across the leaves of the Jade plant, stopping briefly from time to time to groom himself. Almost in disbelief it seemed, because there was nothing to clean off. He ran around some more, buzzed his wings, and as I could see that he was fine, we parted company. So, wasps can be happy.
I never imagined that a bug could be happy, did you? And I’m sure some biological zoologist will tell me I was anthropomorphizing. But Hazel? That bug was happy. And we worked together, as a team, I cooperated with that bug, and he cooperated with me. (That’s the kind of guy I am. Kevin Costner dances with wolves. Ken Cartisano cooperates with bugs.)
The experience confirms my instinctual attraction to Buddhism. Every living thing covets life.
Reply
Well it sounds like you’re tapping into a core Buddhist belief of non harming - I had an actual moment of rejoice for the wasp and I too would have wavered because getting stung by them sucks, so it’s pretty great you saved it :)
Reply
Deep story. Def strikes a chord as my feeds these days are just packed with "7 ways to.." "5 foods to eat.." etc miracle cures to live forever. The book Sapiens really explains how humans makes stories ("money" "leaders" "goals" "experts" "values" etc) to give us something to believe in and make our reality easier to accept.
Reply
I work in healthcare, it’s one of my greatest frustrations. I don’t see it ever changing.
I've heard of the book, I’ll go check it out, thanks for the rec!
Reply
Wow, such a thought provoking piece. Well done. Thank you for sharing. I look forward to reading more from you.
Reply
Thank you Aly!!
Reply
Well, I won't be sleeping tonight pondering this brilliantly written ode. Wonderfully done!
Reply
Who needs sleep
Thank you for reading David, cheers
Reply
Love the deep dive and insights. Thanks for sharing your talent with the world.
Reply
Thank you very much Stephanie!
Reply
That was beautifully presented. I asked my self that questions all the times. Not anymore. Since I got married and become the father don't have time to question world around me. My world are my kids and I am terrified about they well-being in this world. Your story pull something from me that I cover with dust so many years ago. Thank you for that.
Reply
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments. I know exactly what you mean—like the parable at the end. It's one thing to contemplate the existential, but if we spend too much time with it, we forget what's around us, the important things.
Reply
Very thoughtful to use the wind as a vehicle to muse about other intangible (but real!) things, nicely done
Reply
Thank you Martha! It's fun to play with the prompts in a backward way sometimes. Cheers!
Reply
I love all the philosophical angles, thought provoking concepts, allegorical references and metaphors about the wind. This is very unique and original. Well done! So cool.
Reply
Thanks very much Kristi! Sometimes it’s fun to shake up the format.
Reply
Loved this Hazel, the end para was wonderful. You could pick almost any one of the questions posed and create a much bigger story from it, very inspiring :)
Reply
Thank you, Claire! I love that parable, too, it's very meaningful to me. And yes, each question could be its own story, hence the title, haha. I was in a weird mood when I was writing last week.
Reply
Not entirely nonsensical, not an intolerable rant. I'd like to see these statements come from characters in impractical situations, but the concluding lines are great as they stand: Don't allow me to ruminate and endanger myself in so doing, just giving me an effin' hand already! A lesson in pragmatism. Thanks for sharing.
Reply
Thanks for the read Mike. You’re right, it’s not nonsensical, that was kind of the point though. I’m glad the lesson is pragmatism is what stood out though.
Reply