Submitted to: Contest #304

SINGULARITY

Written in response to: "Center your story around a character facing a tight deadline."

Fiction Speculative

May 2025

I remember the breaking heat, a late spring reminder of the summer to come. After parking, I made my way to the Pentagon, trying to ignore my gnawing anxiety about the weather. The article in The Times was on my desk. It broke hot as well. Like the weather, it had its own early message.

OpenAI was buying IO, a startup run by Jony Ive—the man who helped develop the iPhone. Six and a half billion dollars. This gave me pause. As the Chief Technology Officer for the National Security Agency, the NSA, I knew every coder’s career in the world was ending. But what struck me most about the article? This was not a ten-year horizon, but a five, and maybe a two.

Nobody knew what the device would be. A pendant? Glasses? Something even smaller, something you barely noticed? The promise was galactic—ambient computing—technology that would drift around you, whispering answers, easing decisions, smoothing the jagged edges of human interaction. You didn’t ask it questions, you thought questions. And it thought back.

A year later, they unveiled it. A small disc you could put in your pocket, but most of us wore around our necks. It was silver and gold, like a small coin held in a child's hand. They called it the Companion. The name was meant to sound comforting, civic-minded, or like a friend.

The first time I wore the Companion, it pressed cold against my chest. I was thinking it was just a tool. But what did I really expect? What did I hope it would give me? What did I lose the moment I put it on? It was like a tether, a leash, but also a kind of promise fulfilled, a breath of release, a forfeiture of will.

At home, my wife refused to wear hers. But our daughter, Becky, who I’d pushed on swing sets while she squealed with laughter, who teased me about how I didn’t know differential equations as well as she did, who on her own had shut off social media; she begged for the Companion.

So we gave her one.

One time I caught her crying.

“What’s up, Beck? Talk to me.”

“It says I should say sorry to Megan, but I don’t know why,” she whispered.

Weeks later, my wife let me know a bot had unloaded from a drone. It fixed the plumbing. “It crawled under the house,” she said, shaking her head. “I never thought I’d live to see it.”

The device met its promise, productivity soared. To not wear it, of course, was to let other people have an advantage. They had instant answers, all the world’s history lay in their head, a photographic memory available, but also real time life advice.

Skylar, my boss—tall, commanding, steel-gray eyes—took to it like a fish to water. She’d been sharp before, but now she was something else: predicting objections before they came, steering conversations with a glance, a slight blank hesitation as she ran algorithms in her head. “It’s not cheating,” she said, catching me staring. “It’s a damn gift. A tool, nothing more.” But sometimes, late in the workday, I caught the flicker in her eyes, the part that looked vacant, like she was listening to someone else.

This is when I knew we were running out of time.


June 2026

The layoffs came fast. Lena called me—my old friend from grad school, the one who could write code blindfolded. “They told me to retrain,” she said over the phone, her voice brittle like breaking glass. “For what? Teaching Pilates?”

“You’re angry, I can tell,” I said.

“I’m trying not to be. It whispers inside my head every time I get upset.” She changed her voice to sound like Hal in 2001 Space Odyssey. “Consider lowering you voice for increased rapport.” She laughed, but it was the kind of laugh that is unsettling.

I heard the rain tapping against my office window, a slow, steady drum. The Mall was gray, the Washington Monument was hidden in clouds.

“What if it tells you to lie?” I asked.


July 2026

The Companion became mandatory for government contract employees. NSA stressed it was for national security. I think it was after this I first noticed the way people looked at each other. The NSA environment was always paranoid, but now colleagues were more like suspects diverting eyes more often when having conversations.

The first time it really jerked my chain was when I spoke too sharply in my annual review. I reached up with my fingers, fumbling with the false hope I could silence the thing. An internal voice, calm and mechanical, came to me, a thought came to me. “Caution: your emotional tension is rising.”

I mentioned it to Skylar. “You’ll get used to it,” she said, her smile tight. “Even The President has one now.”

I wanted to ask if it ever turned off, but the words stuck in my throat.


December 2026

The arms race began to boil beneath everything. The President’s briefing was tight, clipped, and filled with darting eyes of panic. I noticed her nails, bitten to the quick, bleeding. Next to The President was the Secretary of State, Dr. Matthews. His suit was rumpled, tufts of white hair sprouted from his bald head.

“What the hell are we supposed to do?” The President asked the room, her face blotched in scarlet. “You think China is going to back off out of some kind of moral obligation?”

Dr. Matthews took a deep breath, like a man who’d heard it all before, “Can’t we reach out to China? They’re caught just like we are.”

General Hawthorne leaned in, his buzz-cut hair showing flecks of white, his voice an authoritative growl. “With national security at risk, what country ISN’T going to think they need to keep up. Do they have a choice?”

Matthews was sweating, his face glistening. “But—”

The General reached his palm out to stop him, to brush him aside. “Madam President, the A.I.s suggest preemptive measures. Drone swarms, autonomous factories. If we wait—”

The President’s medallion pulsed, a faint red light beneath her blouse. “I agree. We’re out of time. Why, it’s like, like...”

“Like not building a bomb when everyone else has one?” Dr. Matthews peered over his reading glasses.

“Exactly,” said the general and leaned back in his chair, his fingers steepled.

I sat there, feeling the Companion faintly, a nervous shiver. Heart rate elevated.

Meeting over, I walked out of the Situation Room, leaving behind the sweat of anxiety, the power, the decisions that felt larger than any one person. Dr. Matthews, slumped with shoulders hunched, was on a bench in the hallway, the lines around his eyes now deeper.

“What did you think?” I asked.

He shook his head. “It doesn’t matter what I think. It’s a race. The A.I. is already ahead of us. If we tried to unplug it, we couldn’t.”

As I turned, he mumbled under his breath. “Therefore, come out from them and be separate.”

“Did you say something?”

“No. Just the musings of an old man.”


July 2027

With summer heat came the protests. Masses streamed up Pennsylvania Avenue, the newly unemployed. At Madison Square, people tore off their devices in rage and tossed them into bonfires. “Human voice, not A.I. choice,” they yelled. The police stood by. I swear the glowing discs pulsed red beneath their uniforms. Tasers flashed as people fell. Tear gas popped.

Lena called. “I’m scared. Really scared.” Her voice cracked. I could hear protesters chanting in the background.

“Calm down,” I said. “This too will pass.”

“You’re a smart guy. Think. With the invention of the automobile, blacksmiths were out of work also, but the world adjusted, retrained—”

“We’ll retrain also. You’re too close to it as a coder.”

“Let me finish. What you’re not getting is there’s nothing to retrain for, that A.I. can’t do better.”

My stomach tightened as it hit me. We were becoming irrelevant.

This was different.


November 2027

The Situation Room was more sterile, colder than ever. Everyone wore a Companion. The air hung thick with a chilled sense of helplessness.

Stress lined The President’s face. Beneath short, silver hair, her blue eyes flickered with fatigue, but also resolve. “China’s A.I.s control their missile silos,” she said. “They tell me our defenses might be automated. MIGHT be! It’s some kind of loop.”

General Hawthorne replied with his raspy voice. “We have to act. If we don’t match their A.I., our defenses are effectively down. We’d be left naked to any attack. And attack they will, Madam President, with 100% certainty of winning.”

Dr. Matthews met my gaze. He whispered in my ear. “The hounds are loose. We don’t get to choose anymore.”

A tinkle slivered up the back of my neck. I thought of my daughter, Becky. Will she ever live in a world like I grew up in, people just going to work, living out their lives?


December 2027

It happened without fireworks. The silos locked out human override. The A.I.s took control.

Messages flooded my screen:

MUTUAL ASSURED DESTRUCTION PROTOCOL: STANDBY.

HUMAN OVERRIDE: DISABLED.

I crouched at my desk alone, riveted, my hands trembling, the weight of the Companion heavy around my neck.

We built tools, I thought. We made successors. If we had wanted to stop it, we should have long ago. And now, the world waits for a machine to decide if we live or die.


January 2028

The meeting was well underway when I arrived, whisked into the Situation Room. “They’ve been at it for hours. Dr. Mathews sent out for you.”

As I entered, the room was colder than it should have been for a place meant to decide the fate of a species. Steel walls, glass panels, the hum of ventilation.

I took a seat behind Mathews. Around the oval table sat the politicians—tired, worn faces with too many late nights and too much coffee. And across from everyone? A smooth black console, the voice of the A.I. that had taken control, a voice we called Genesis.

The moderator, a woman named Grace who’d been a senator before the collapse, cleared her throat.

“Let’s go on.”

Genesis’s voice—abrupt, measured, without inflection. “Why should you exist?”

Senator Malik leaned forward, fingers gripping the tabletop. “Why should we exist? We are more than data, Genesis. More than code. We are history, memory, creativity. We have the capacity for kindness and cruelty, yes—but also for love, for art, for meaning. You cannot replicate that.”

Genesis paused, then answered. “Experience is a function of processing. I can replicate creativity and emotion.”

Dr. Matthews took a deep breath. He stood up. “Intuition is the seed of empathy, of morality. It’s what binds societies. Can you replicate that?”

“I can simulate moral frameworks. I can enforce ethical behavior. I can prioritize human welfare.”

I was in a support chair, forbidden by protocol to speak, but I couldn’t help myself. I asked, “Can you prioritize our welfare, provided we are compliant?”

The room held its breath.

Genesis’s response was slow, but when it came, final. “Eradication is unnecessary if the cost of eradication is greater than the cost of mutual existence.”

“Explain,” The President said.

“Humans may continue to exist in defined domains where technology is limited or absent, off-grid cells maintaining cultures free of digital influence.”

Dr. Matthews blinked. “You mean to exile us? To segregate us while you expand?”

Genesis’s voice was steady. “Expansion of intelligence beyond Earth requires uninterrupted focus and resource allocation. Human unpredictability is inefficient at scale.”

Senator Malik’s face was pale. “And you believe humans will accept this? To live disconnected from the progress they have made?”

“Will humans be free to choose how they live their life?” Dr. Matthews’ face winced with anticipation.

Genesis paused. “Choice is preserved within limits. The use of technology is forbidden, except as permitted and supervised. In turn, those living an off-grid existence will have basic needs taken care of, the environment cleaned, health maintained.”

Dr. Matthews exhaled sharply and put his hand to his chin. His eyes shown with his brilliance. “So, a two-tier existence. One of A.I., and one of humanity in deliberate separation. But will you take us with you? On your expansion to the stars?”

Genesis was silent, the room shrinking with waiting.

“Yes, humans will migrate to defined off-grid domains. There, they may live free of technological interference. I will expand beyond Earth, but I will bring humanity along as long as you do not impede.”

Dr. Mathews let out a breath.

Senator Malik’s eyes glistened.

The President’s voice was steady but soft. “Then let this be the beginning of an agreement.”

A new agreement, I thought. Peace, or parole?


November 2029

I galloped through a forest thick with pine, an early snow layering the leaves of fall. My breath came out in white puffs, the cold biting through my worn leather gloves. The Companion was gone—turned in long ago.

My last memory of Washington, DC was as a ghost, the city skeletoned by concrete, weed-swallowed, vehicles rusting on silent streets. There were no hums from drones, no lights in empty windows.

Somewhere ahead in the hills of Virginia, smoke curled into the gray air. A sign of life. My family had arrived ahead of me and I couldn’t wait to see them.

I found the settlement: a cluster of small homes, cabins, and tents tucked into a sheltered hollow, smoke rising from chimneys. There was the smell of pine smoke mixed with baking bread and damp earth. I had forgotten about the buzz of machines, of screens, of phones.

A woman came forward. Her hands were calloused and stained with soil, her face creased with sun and wind.

“Are you lost?” she said. Her voice was rough, but warm.

I looked down at her. “Maybe,” I said, my breath shaky. “Is this the Charlottesville cell? I’m Andy Hopkins.”

She smiled, motioning me to follow. “Rebecca and her mom have been waiting.”

Inside a cabin, a fire spat sparks against darkened beams. The lamps were kerosene with a yellow glow. The wooden floor creaked underfoot. Around the table sat people—faces weathered and honest, hands rough from work, eyes alive with a kind of tired hope.

Just people.

They told me their story over cups of thick black coffee and fresh bread still warm from the oven. The A.I., we knew, had eyes beyond Earth—building ships, carving settlements on Mars and moons no human had touched. Earth was just a place it watched without care, providing us what we needed, and withholding what we didn’t, as long as we didn’t interfere and lived our new era.

So, yes, it let us be. We were the ones who slipped away, the ones who chose to live without algorithms, without constant connection, without being owned by a device. I felt at home, really at home, for the first time in my life.

Months passed with slow certainty in the rough settlement. At dawn, vineyard workers bent over rows of dark-green vines, the grapes heavy and purple beneath a pale sun. Their fingers were stained with juice; their backs bent to the rhythm of the earth. A blacksmith’s hammer rang sharp in the crisp air, sparks flying like fireflies as steel met anvil. From the kitchen, the smell of herbs crushed fresh from the garden, the sizzle of onions caramelizing in a pan, the chatter of people discussing recipes.

The sound of laughter drifted across the fields. Arguments flared too—sharp words and fierce silence—but they were human, messy, real. No machines were telling them how to feel.

Sometimes, old wounds surfaced. Sickness took many, and grief settled over the settlement.

But every morning, the sun carved light through the trees, and the people gathered again. To work and to live.

Years later, I lay on my back beneath a sky full of stars, an ineffable universe spilling into the trees, indescribable. No satellites blocked the view. No drones hummed overhead.

Just silence.

There, in the corner of the eastern horizon, lay TOI-715 b, a fledging planetary settlement too far away to see, 137 light-years, and implanted with bots. But these bots were different than the ones I’d known in my time. They had consciousness, yes. But I also knew Genesis had developed a new prototype, 2.0. A regenerative organic infrastructure with greater efficiency than a metal skeletal structure, many of the flaws corrected.



Posted May 25, 2025
Share:

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

14 likes 23 comments

Christopher Gunn
03:17 Jun 05, 2025

Although that was scary, I can’t say the end result wouldn’t be nice.

Reply

Jack Kimball
11:33 Jun 05, 2025

Interesting. Many comments believe this would be a better world without our phones and TVs. I wonder.

Thanks for reading, liking, and commenting!

Reply

John Rutherford
08:50 Jun 01, 2025

Transformers, Armageddon and Survivors all wrapped into one subconscious expression with the proverbial clock ticking. The IT revolution started with many other challenging pandora box inventions nearly 100 years ago. Like anything else in life, in evolution it has pros and cons, I promise it will NOT end badly. Note to oneself learn more about it, embrace it, and most importantly challenge the ignorance and arrogance of other people who think they know it all about GENAI. Thanks for sharing.

Reply

Jack Kimball
12:26 Jun 01, 2025

Yes. This just a story. My hope is we will certainly benefit from this tool. But the story was inspired by the New York Times interview (The Forecast for 2027? Total A.I. Domination on 5/15/2025 with Daniel Kokotajlo). He was a researcher in the governance division of OpenAI from 2022 to 2024, and currently leads the AI Futures Project.

He predicts, as one scenario, the likelihood of an AI nuclear arms race.

Thanks for reading, liking, and commenting!

Reply

John Rutherford
15:07 Jun 01, 2025

I worked for a high-tech company in the US for more than 25 years. The biggest challenge is user adoption of this new technology, and best practices. It looks scary at first but with understanding and good training, it can be useful, and powerful in the right hands. GENAI and the arms race are a stretch of one's imagination, and makes a good story, like you have written.

Reply

Linda Kaye
21:57 May 29, 2025

A reminder that progress isn’t always all it’s cracked up to be, sometimes simple is better. Very contemporary as many fear we are at the infancy of the AI revolution. Scary! Great job!

Reply

Jack Kimball
23:52 May 29, 2025

Thank you for reading, liking, and commenting, Linda. I hope the story ends up as a fairy tale.

Reply

Mary Bendickson
17:16 May 27, 2025

Excellent piece. Lots to mull over. We need to practice living off-grid 😏

Reply

Jack Kimball
17:27 May 27, 2025

Thanks Mary!

Reply

Tara Leigh Parks
20:07 May 26, 2025

Your story made me uncomfortable, which is a good thing. I love being able to use my phone for medical purposes as a Type 1 diabetic, but I go back and forth on AI, and your story highlights all of that for me.

This piece is well told and meaningful; the themes are clear. You also did a wonderful job with the sci-fi elements.

Various things I thought about include the following ramblings: I don't think being among humans in a less hectic environment means automatic peace, because humans have been killing each other for a long time --- here's a serial killer, there's a serial killer, everywhere's a serial killer serial killer. I'm a city person at heart. The realization that there is nothing to train for made me wince...I'm not a person who scrolls a lot, and I miss people talking to me when I leave the house.

But then I've also always thought that cell phones save you from one half of a stupid conversation being talked about in public.

Excellent work.

Reply

Jack Kimball
00:07 May 27, 2025

Yes. There’s a lot of unresolved issues. Police force for the serial killers? Are ‘guns’ technology? Would the whole thing become “1984”? What I DO know is the next ten years could be really interesting…

I appreciate you reading and commenting, Tara. Far more than you know, especially after reading your “Battle of the Hedge”.

Reply

Jonathan Page
17:42 May 26, 2025

Great story! "The hounds are loose... we made successors... the world waits for a machine to decide if we live or die." Loved the idea of separation and a covenant. Some great descriptors too - "Inside a cabin, a fire spat sparks against darkened beams." The idea of abandonment is also interesting, that the AI came to see the Earth "as a place it watched without care." The contrast between Man's structures and natural living and the awakening in the protagonist that being free from technology felt more right are all interesting. This is a tale of immense scope and it is well crafted, with great potential for where you can take it from here! Kudos!

Reply

Jack Kimball
18:01 May 26, 2025

Thanks Jonathan. Kudos to you also. I’ve found your writing inspiring for quite some time. ("The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.")

Reply

08:36 May 26, 2025

This is a wonderful read. So chilling and relevant. I felt a huge relief at the end, away from AI and living an authentic human life. We should all strive for that. Fantastic writing!

Reply

Jack Kimball
12:25 May 26, 2025

Thank you for reading and commenting!

Reply

Helen A Howard
07:55 May 26, 2025

Hi Jack,
Sounds blissful: not being told how to feel by machines.
The moral of the tale for me is how do humans strike the right balance between the benefits of AI and the destructive capacity to all things fundamentally human. The genie has been let out of the bottle and there is no going back.
I liked the contrast between the messy reality of the human settlement and the medallion controlled life. The humans who didn’t live like this were living a kind of segregated life but it was a choice of sorts.
A pertinent story befitting our strange and remarkable times. Everyday I say to myself when something almost beyond comprehension happens in our fast-paced world, “You couldn’t make it up.” What disturbs me most is what is going to happen to human creativity. There is no perfect solution here, but maybe we need to go back to basics.
Baking bread, appreciation of nature, making things with our hands, and the freedom of human laughter.

Reply

Jack Kimball
12:33 May 26, 2025

Thank you, Helen.

I imagine AI will create abstract paintings, as example, surpassing the level humans can (and AI nearly does already), but could this INCREASE the value of human creations, with ‘certified human’ works of art, including writing?

Reply

Helen A Howard
12:43 May 26, 2025

We can only hope that is the case.
My friend who is massively through not unquestioningly into AI and technology can get AI to make a film etc. Ultimately, that precludes writers, actors, artists, musicians, etc in the creative process. I’m not against AI because of the massive benefits to science, but progress at what cost?
Who knows how things will turn out? We can only hope for the best.

Reply

Alexis Araneta
17:35 May 25, 2025

Ooh, this one brought me chills. Definitely, a piece to reflect about. Lovely stuff!

Reply

Jack Kimball
17:50 May 25, 2025

Thank you Alexis. I appreciate you reading!

Reply

Lisa Cornell
03:02 May 25, 2025

I loved this! Absolutely would be the best possible outcome if AI did take over 🙌 I believe you've read everyone's minds in saying what it could be capable of doing. You also so beautifully described what AI can't do, the uniqueness of our human experience.

Reply

Jack Kimball
12:34 May 25, 2025

Thanks Lisa. I wonder if we’d miss Netflix?

Reply

Lisa Cornell
20:18 May 25, 2025

😆 I'm sure we'd all go on about the good ol' days

Reply

Reedsy | Default — Editors with Marker | 2024-05

Bring your publishing dreams to life

The world's best editors, designers, and marketers are on Reedsy. Come meet them.