When Charles was a wee boy, in the midst of his youthful glory, he swore that naught would waylay him from achieving his paramount goal: being a fluent, recondite, whimsical, and comedical writer. “NO,” exclaimed John, after having his mind, body, soul, and - acutest of all - wrist ossified upon the weaving woes of wavering for hours. “No, Charles is such a common, hackneyed name. My protagonist must be elegant, suave though not pompous, and relatable.” In a trice, a miracle twinkled upon his derelict page where inked those insipid words, “Argos!” said John, contradicting his own wish to not have the character be replete with pomposity.
Once more, John began:
When Argos ripened to that decisive point where adolescents peak in their handsome beauty, he knew that his vocation was to be a writer. He toiled dusks, where the lunar gloaming glimmered through his glum study, upon dawns, where the dragonesque sun soared across the skies, so as to perfect his ideal of being the greatest writer to have consummated a novel. What most enamoured Argos were the days of yore, where metaphors, imagery, sibilance, and other techniques besides, abounded - where phrases billowed upon one’s palette with dexterous wit - and were not yet sodomised by truncation, simplification, or scriptural sloth. Argos loathed the art of…. “No, this is too pretentious!” bemoaned Argos. “Why would he adore the literature of old, and abhor its newer vogues, when I desire him to be relatable and suave.” John nettled at his bristly beard, unshorn from his drudgery and enslavement to his work, musing till a phantom thread fluttered upon his inhibitory ebb and tide:
“He can’t be some literary romanticist or reverist. To stab at the heart of what I purpose, he ought to be ordinary, struggling, and pitiable.” That nettlesome urge, again, propounded John to now gnaw at his beard. “HE SHALL BE A JUVENILE SAILOR!” Thwacking his hand upon his birchen desk, scattering the detritus of former conceptions which had but led to dust, decrepitude, and dolour.
“The name Argos must be abolished. Instead,” his eyes irradiated molten joy, “the protagonist shall be called Stoker - sprinkle some Gothicism in there whilst I am at it. I shall make it his first journey at sea, marred by a feverous tempest from the southernmost ire on Earth! What a horrid and sympathizable tale it would be.” John picked up the pen, and bedaubed its nib into his voluminous inkwell; though, before he came nigh to executing anything, he indulged in more gloating:
“This is brilliant,” resting the sodden nib aside, “the narrative has tension, is devoid of bathos, and gives me bountiful opportunities to conjure up some startling imagery.” John slinked back in his chair, estranging yet farther from his duties, and lolled his tongue in veneration of himself. “It shall lend its rigour to the French Naturalists; it shall waft the psychological odour of Dostoevsky with philosophical finesse! I can envisage the critics now: Moby Dick has, after but of late having reaped due recognition, been expunged by a precious author.” The envy of John envenomed through a hostile glower as he fantasised, “I’ll smear that White Whale of all its peculiar snow-white wrinkles, and outflank the enigma surrounding its pyramidical hump. They shall hail me as the heir apparent to Shakespeare!” The irony being that John had never read - nor dared to read - a Shakespearian play in the entirety of his specious life. Even when his school had enforced that all must be taught of how Shakespeare riddles, John had been truant with the onerous difficulty of decoding Shakespearian archaisms. Further, nor had John ever opened Moby Dick; let alone any of the persons cited above. John deceived he and his friends of his supreme intellect by sifting through interpretations spanning all authors, novelists, playwrights, and poets. It was John’s method of purporting to be grander and wiser than his peers. John rejoiced in worshipful vainglory of an irrelevant man, such as he himself pertained to. It is little wonder, then, why John foundered in such laughable fashion when attempting to be a writer.
“No, that makes no sense whatsoever!” bellowed our actual, troubled writer. “How could John be speaking with the verve that he is, if he had always shirked from reading these geniuses.” Desponding, our innominate writer pondered over how to amend this discontinuity. “John could be less omnipresent - but that would be unbuilding all which I had thus far wrought for. Am I zealous enough to recommence from the start? With me swithering as I am, then it is probable that no, I cannot.” A belch of frustration, from our innominate writer, dogged his train of doubt:
“Could the protagonist be prudent, and the issue lie more in his ineptitude to conceive of a plot? Would the average reader not be depressed, though, by being aweary from the cyclical nature of this? Yes,” concluded our innominate writer, “they would soon tire of this repetition. Then what!?
“O’ why is writing so much harder than rumoured to be?” introspected he aloud, as he gawked outside at two nonchalant birds entwined in rapt ease. “Why can’t,” pointing to these birds, “life be as uncomplicated as theirs. Flying afloat the downy clouds, feasting off the tinier creatures, and beholding the world at its topmost altitude. No, that would be too merciful for us humans!”
Our innominate writer veered from the window, and examined his plenitude of unfruitful endeavours. “Perhaps”, thought he, “I ought to stop wasting my time with these idle pursuits.” Rheum serpentined down his cheek, welling and cresting as it rippled across a sinuous furrow, or pustular elevation in his skin. In a sudden fury of lugubrious grudgement, our innominate writer, fordoing the trials and tribulations, altogether renunciated his beast of burden:
“Besides, there are too many wishful artists nowadays! What importance would I bring or have to say,” he halted for histrionic effect, “ nothing!” Arising from his chair, where fossilised the relics of his curst turmoils, our innominate author declared:
“I forfeit.”
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
Wow Im not good at reading but this might get me into it
Reply
I'll be a parrhesiastes: The problem with having a good vocabulary is that one tends to use it.
I once did an experiment with ChatGP, which lets you ask for its report written in different levels. Its response at the academic level was pompous and painful to read. The response at a normal level was adequate. Its answer at the elementary school level sparkled.
I'll not write at a see-Spot-run level, but will try for simplicity. Might toss in one unusual word, though, to establish my credentials.
Reply
Interesting! Complex. A litttttlee bit heavy going if I'm honest to read it due to the vocabulary used, it did keep putting the handbrake on for me as I was reading as some of the words were very unwieldy. Obviously that was the intent , but maybe a small bit of toning down of it might improve the flow of the read. Just my humble opinion.
For a first entry from someone who just joined and doesnt yet follow anyone and hasnt commented on anyone else's story or engaged with anyone you have managed to secure an impressive number of 'likes', more than people who have been here years with loads of stories and followers, so you must be doing something right! I have a feeling, as someone else noted, that you must be an established writer outside of here with a large following already.
Anyway!
Welcome to Reedsy
Reply
Hi Derrick,
I very much appreciate your feedback, and thank you for reading the short. I am glad you saw the intent was to be heavy going, though I can completely see its excessive flow. Through this story, I was showing my own conflict really of, oftentimes, using this kind of - shall we say - verbiage. I have a love for olden literature, which I need not elaborate on their own profuse language.
I am not actually an established author, though I am releasing my first collection of shorts, this Friday.
Reply
Hi, Max ! I saw this in the list of stories submitted for Contest 266 and had to read it. The references to literature were impeccably used. Rich, flowing vocabulary too.
My only wish is to know more about Charles/Argos and how he feels about being constantly changed. I don't know. I feel like the prompt is such a good opportunity to poke fun at ourselves as writers and let us feel for the characters we create, and to have this mostly be in John's perspective made me think "But what about the character?"
Oh, and 1 million percent, I prefer Charles to Argos. Hahaha !
Great job !
Reply
Hi Alexis,
Thank you so much for your feedback. You have a definite point about Argos and Charles, I suppose I wanted them to be so ill-wrought by their writer, that they had no purpose besides showing the conflict between his own lack of competence.
P.S - I, too, prefer Charles to Argos.
Reply
This purple prose epistle made me giggle. But with a character thinking like someone from Medieval times (?) this is perfect. You are either a genius or a thesaurus. I'm not sure which. (A secret - the average Medieval person never spoke this way. I laughed when you described someone as emulating Shakespeare without having read an entire Shakespearean play!)
I had to look up one word. 'bathos' - perfect word. I thought it was a typo for pathos - LOL. I am a bit of a walking dictionary myself. But not when I write.
Welcome to Reedsy. I genuinely mean it. I sense you are not a new writer. (33 likes for a 1st offering! - so popular) And I gather you don't normally drown your readers in bucket loads of big words. The fact your story is approved is an achievement. I don't mean that negatively.
A tip for you, though. It's hard to read large paragraphs. More space means easier to read. Start speech on a new line every time unless it's an actual continuation of a chunk of dialogue. When the action or narrative starts again, new line. (Sorry, can't help myself.)
John, your wordy author, needs to look up 'second guess.' He should know that this word covers more than "fickle". Unless the title is a paradox for what follows. Your author is not fickle. He is grandiloquent! You didn't use that one. (It's hard to find a unique word to describe anything after reading your story.) The word 'Art' in the title says it all. John is an amazing (grandiose) wordsmith even if most readers won't understand him.
Just in case this first story wasn't written tongue-in-cheek, (idiom for a dry sense of humor, which I believe you to have) this will make you laugh. From the top of the list of stories in this competition I have read every story with the most 'likes' except yours. I decided to turn the 'like' blue. It's prettier that way. (I'm pedantic) But I'm too honest not to read and make a comment. Then it surprised me how popular this story is as you are new to Reedsy. And you are obviously not a beginner writer. Nothing about you in your profile. Mm. Lets read. . . You've got to be kidding me! He writes like I think! I get you.
Reply
Hi Kaitlyn,
Thank you for your feedback and for reading the short. I am not a new writer, though I have begun to find my way of late. For a year now, I have been writing on a regular, obsessive basis - as it very much becomes an obsession for me. I have noted the advice on spacing my paragraphs - I still have a lot to learn. My profile is blank as, to be honest, I have received so many rejections that I thought little of entering the competition, and sent it on a whim. As well as me liking a certain level of privacy, I am about twenty-one years old, and am quite self-conscious with writing (though it may seem otherwise).
I love the obscure word bathos, and often use it, as I believe we experience it every day. Bathos, pathos, and ethos are underrated.
The comment of you being a walking thesaurus made me laugh. My problem, which your idiom hits perfectly, is my own inability - or, let us say, hamartia - when writing is the pages of my internal thesaurus unwinding upon the page. In a sense, the irony here is that the jest of John was chiding myself.
Yes, it is funny. When you read medieval tales of Lancelot, and all those knights wielding their shiny swords, you realise how simple their writing was. It is but when you land upon Shakespeare onwards that you see the verbose - to coin your word - grandiloquence be used. Even Shakespeare was not verbose, but the literary kin after him were. I do like the unearthly feel that archaisms have when reading. They can doubtless be alienating, which means one must be wise and purposeful when using them.
Reply
Thanks for opening up and sharing. Very interesting. Do take notice of comments made, even negative ones, as you will learn a lot. And read others' stories. (Mine, for example?) You can learn how to do things from others. Or get ideas that fit in with your desire to conform. I hate that word. I am not about winning. I am happy to be approved and read. And I have limited time so reach out to some and not others due to time constraints.
I hate to say this but using lots of words that send readers to the dictionary is not the way to appeal to other writers. I get it, though. There is some satisfaction in writing a story for the many, not the few. Your choice of course. This 1st story lent itself to being written just as you have. Now that I've glanced at your second, I'm wondering if anyone ever told you to be more 'wise and purposeful'? I can be rather candid. Sorry.
That said, I do not always agree with the winning stories being so classified. Typos and incorrect grammar are overlooked at times. The judges do not look at excellent writing alone. Popular isn't always a winner. !st stories also have a greater chance to win. Especially if they are unique. Who would enter if the only ones chosen are the long-term favorites? I'm so glad you entered on a whim. I have enjoyed meeting in Reedsy, someone passionate about words! I'll freely admit that what I wrote at age 21 was spectacularly abysmal. I wrote a manuscript of two books before I ever tackled a short story. I had to learn that a short story doesn't include lessons about things written about. eg I wrote a story about finding a blood coral necklace in a secondhand store - sold for a dollar because the shop keeper thought it was plastic. Wonderful story. It ended up a discussion on the evils of taking things from our oceans and how that affects the environment. Riveting stuff, don't you think? And 'liked'. A cautionary tale. This is not how to write a short story. You did a better job with your 1st one! Keep on keeping on! The true author is a very humble person who loves assistance from others.
Research, research, research anything about writing. You will be amazed at what's out there. Book Baby have some great articles on writing. This site has awesome ones too. You can privately take some ideas on board.
Reply
Definitely - criticism is needed if one wishes to improve their work. Receiving grovelling compliments all the time both inflates the ego, and stagnates actual furtherance. If anything, feel free to give me some feedback on the most recent short. I would love to hear your advice.
I am often told to lessen my use of complex words - or be "wise and purposeful". I will do so, but then the second I begin feeling the flow come on, I fall back into that bad habit. I need! to change it when rereading. My intention, though, is not to appeal to other writers. I like poetic sounding literature, and I suppose it is me emulating it.
What were the books about? Secondly, what drew you to write, if there is a definable factor?
Reply
I will definitely read your other story. Old habits die hard!
Reply
I'm sure you had loads of fun writing it, I'm just a little tired of running back and forth to the dictionary. So, I gave up after three paragraphs. Best of luck in the contest
Reply
Thank you for the feedback, Trudy. Likewise to you.
Reply
A beautiful mind!
Reply
What a vocabulary!
Reply