A woman, slightly past her prime, drapes herself in a cardinal red wingback. Her Slavic features, or at least those details which constitute a recognisable face, are inscrutable. Only the eyes, dancing with malice, betray her hauteur. She wears a long string of pearls, which form a seeded rope between her sagging breasts. They are the only notable detail of the pose, for the woman, dark-haired and dark-eyed, is otherwise naked.
At her left shoulder the sun forms a square of light on her already pale flesh. It lends an angularity to her - that cavity where her heart resides set apart by a whimsy of sunbeam, to the rest of her softening body. In the street below, teeming with Parisian decorum, the low murmur of human activity, roaming with either great purpose or with no broad intention, can be heard beneath the louder susurration of motor cars and slow hoof beat.
Earlier, when office girls click-clacked and cafe owners raised their faces to the pavement sun, scratching their aproned bellies, she had gone to Printemps for lipstick. A specific shade to match the chair she now sat upon. Such variety the world has to offer, she mused. So much to choose from when one has the financial means to browse, and not to beg or steal.
The lipstick was placed in a pale yellow box and although she demurred at the wastefulness, the girl insisted - the box being proof of purchase - the implication being that a vast number of small cosmetic items found their way into side pockets. It must be difficult, she thought, to strike the balance between the provision of good service and watchfulness.
It is difficult to be a good wife whilst striving for the same.
*****
He stands some five feet away, the bulk of his naked upper torso hidden by easel and canvas. The studio is unkempt and suffused with the smell of paint, like snubbed tallow. He absent-mindedly, occasionally, wipes the wet bristles onto his flesh. She tries to discern the nature of his painting by the colours he has bedaubed himself with, but whenever she looks at him too hard, he gazes back, and what fills the brown eyes, deeply creased at their corners, beckon a warning. She stares defiantly back.
His father had also been an artist, although more a teacher than an enfant terrible. Thus his passage had been facilitated, as it so often is, by that early assistance. She often wonders where he would have been without it, (if his father had been a customs official or a lamplighter), but that is an impossible question, like asking how she would feel if she were a man, or what would have happened to Russia without the revolution. When things happen, there is no more room for reflection. The course had been re-set. Destiny required, indeed demanded, that his father should be just who he was.
When they first met, he had told her, cryptically, that ‘In art, you must first kill your father.’
Men like her husband must always outdo their male parent. It is not a compelling force within women, for it is not hard to outdo your mother’s embroidery skills, or cooking arts, or typing speed per minute. It is not a thought which occurs to women at all, whereas she recalls an early love, when just fifteen: a handsome, blue-eyed boy in the Russian Imperial Army, a subordinate of her father’s, who came courting. When she asked him why he had joined the army, (because other options had been available), he told her that he would leave once his rank rose above that of his own father’s. And so the dye is set. Now, naked in the wingback, she allows her mind to wonder what might have happened had she married him instead.
He died fighting for the White Army in the revolutionary war, so she would have been a widow, but she would not, she suspected, have been a humiliated relict.
*****
Aside from the cardinal red lipstick and the pearls, she wore ballet pumps on her feet. He could be brutal with feet and she protected them from his gaze. The feel of them, the ribbons around her ankles, take her back to the Ballets Russe and Diaghilev’s disturbing works. Such uproar, at first, at the dystopian, bizarre sets designed by the man stood before her now. And then quickly subsumed when the public were told to believe that the emperor, was indeed, wearing the finest clothing. And then? Cut to applause!
She was not a prima ballerina. Although beautiful and statuesque, she was never more than a trouper. But she had been drawn to him; the force of his nature, the territorial ambition of his gaze. The broad, generous nose, the thick shock of hair, the agile, virile body. Sandalwood and cigarette smoke. An effete artiste would not have been to her taste. This man was sun-soaked matador, and she was not immune to such charms.
She wrote to her mother in Ukraine, just as the first shots of the revolution were fired. Amid the anxiety of future shock, her mother strongly advised her to play the Ann Boleyn to Henry VIII. Do not let your mask slip, nor your foolish, giddy heart betray you. I have never heard of this man, but you say he is wealthy and rising. There have been times when I would advise against a man of such temperament, but now I would urge the contrary. Lord knows where money will come from now, Dochen’ka, so look to yourself and your material comforts. Russia is all but gone.
Diaghilev, who had noticed the rising ardour between them, pulled him to one side and gave some sage advice of his own: ‘You must marry Russian girls,’ he said.
And so he did.
At the Russian Orthodox cathedral in Paris, she walked up the aisle leaning heavily on a cane, having landed badly during her final performance. His face, so proud and loving when she stood by his side, her elation at being this man’s wife, the anticipation of the night ahead, his wealth, his position, his manliness. It would be impossible for a woman to desire a man more than she did on that day.
They honeymooned in Biarritz, where he painted her in neo-classicist shades of melancholy, at her sore leg, and from the increasingly disturbing news from home. It was a beautiful painting.
And she still loves him, even as, (or perhaps because) her mind slowly fragments in the face of his crudities. And now she glares at him as he glares at her. They have not spoken since this morning, when she walked into his studio and said,
‘I demand that you paint me. I am your muse. I am your wife. I am the mother of your son.’
And he scoffed, but then, later, finding her in the kitchen, he said, ‘Of course I shall paint you, cherie. Present yourself tomorrow at ten.’ (They converse in French, the language of privilege, but not that of her heart).
She believes in the sanctity of love. She believes in her place in his life, his first and only wife. She believes that he loves their son, Paul, and that he still loves her, with less immediacy, perhaps, but surely with more depth? She recalls the glorious days in Biarritz, Dinard, Juan-le-Pins, London, the social whirl where she, a woman of aristocratic upbringing, sought to drag him away from the bohemians and into the bosom of the bourgeoisie.
For several years he was happy with this, but you can’t seem to take the fight out of the dog. He drifts, he hankers for other women. There have been many of them. He is a man who must always be in the first throes of love. He does not understand the incremental layers of long romance, the different, more elevated experience which that patience and constancy can procure.
And so for many years, she has played her part, applied the face paint and the latest fashions, graced the salons and the grand openings, closing her ears (although not entirely) to the bohemians who viewed her as a spirited horse might view a plough: who find her cold and haughty, and laugh at her ponderous French.
He puffs away on a cigarillo, moving his head this way and that, seeing her without looking at her. He often tells a story about the day he was born. He was blue and lethargic and it was thought he was stillborn. An uncle, leaning over in concern, blew cigar smoke upon the newborn, who promptly coughed and roused himself sufficiently. He is fond of telling that story.
‘I am taking a break,’ he announces. ‘Put your robe on. Be back here at two.’
She acquiesced, without speaking, and he locks the door before going to his latest mistress, who he keeps upstairs as his yellow-haired muse. She is still a teenager and he is middle-aged.
Just before he took the stairs upwards, he grabbed at his wife, held her face between his painted hands, and kissed her passionately on her cardinal red lips.
‘You are too jealous,’ he whispered in her ear. ‘It is an ugly sentiment, cherie.’
As he disappears towards the yellow-haired girl, she wonders how ugly his own sentiments might be if she were to take a lover of her own.
Lying naked on the bed, she traces her body with her fingers. The silhouette of the thirty-six year old is similar to her dancing days. She has not changed her hair of her dressing habits, and yet there is a gravity at work, as it works upon us all, and she wonders if she will ever be made love to again. If they will slip into their older years and find a companionship compatible with fond and loving feeling. Or will he continue to take his women on holiday with them?
Will she go mad in the waiting?
She drifts off to sleep in the muffled house in the Parisian street and dreams of Russia. She is awoken by an impatient rapping on her bedroom door, and then there he stands, with evidence of his priapic interlude still quite evident. She sees her looking down at him, and smiles.
‘Come along, girl. You demand a portrait - let’s give you what you want.’
There is silence in the studio as she slips off her robe and assumes her earlier pose. He had covered the canvas with tarp, which has not hitherto been a quirk of his, and for a long while there is no sound from either inside the studio or outside in the streets. It begins to oppress her, and she blurts out that she wants a divorce.
‘In an ideal world,’ he said, ‘yes, you could divorce me. You could return to what is left of your family, to your dacha and dumplings, and live under the tender rule of Stalin. But I will not let you divorce me, Olga.’
‘Why?’ She asks, ashamed for asking it. Ashamed that she holds in her heart all that she desperately wants him to say …. because I love you, cherie.
But that is not what he says. He says, ‘Because if I grant you a divorce, you get half of my fortune. Half of my unsold work, half of the clothes off my back, (although he was wearing none), half of everything I have worked for. So no, I will not allow you to divorce me. I won’t sign the papers. Be happy with what you have, or go mad.’ He shrugged, as if it was of no importance to him each or either way.
The first time he kissed her was the evening she agreed to marry him. She had just come off the stage, sweated but still immaculate in that immutable way of ballerinas everywhere. He waited in the wings, eager, and held her face in much the same way, and with the same fervour, he had recently held it on the landing between their separated lives.
His lips were soft and searching. His body, pressing against hers, was solid. He smelt of absinthe and tobacco, of snubbed tallow. And he cried with happiness when she finally reciprocated, after months of froidure, and his tears tasted of Mediterranean brine and salted olives.
And she looks at him now, through drowsy eyes, as he hums an Andalusian folk song - stepping back, assessing, nodding, happy with himself. And there is savagery in it.
Yesterday she had received a letter from a childhood friend, a Russian emigré now living in London. She was complaining about the impossibility of love, especially in these turbulent times. How all was damage, everywhere. She wrote …. ‘I firmly believe that the luckiest thing that can happen to a woman is to fall in love and to stay in love forever, and he with her. I think it is as rare as cranberries in February, Olga. I am already mourning the lack of it, and wish to scream at those who don’t appreciate what they have ….’
The spring sun is sliding to the west. A clock chimes on the landing. She can hear her son’s piping voice, home from a picnic in the Bois de Boulogne with friends. He won’t come in here and see his mother naked. He is never allowed in the studio rooms, but her husband, perhaps eager to see the boy, declares himself finished and leaves her abruptly.
At the door he says, ‘That was the last time I shall ever kiss you. The last time I shall ever paint you. You will not like it, cherie. But I paint what I see.’
For a few moments, she remains seated. And her shoulders, held so proudly all day, sag. She views herself as a sparrow on the ledge might view her. An exposed woman, goose-fleshed and powerless, in ridiculously garish lipstick and ballet pumps.
She slipped on her robe and approached the easel. To the sound of hubbub downstairs, of admonitions to wash hands and go to the kitchen for cake, she looks at the work and gasps. It is the ugliest work of his career. She is depicted, open-legged, breasts askew, wreathed in blood with the head and teeth of a lamprey eel trapped in a net.
And it will sell for a fortune.
In a state of shock, she dresses carefully and wipes away the cardinal red lipstick. Straightening her skirts, she walks downstairs to her son, who embraces her excitedly and regales her of his adventures in the woods. And although it has occurred to her a hundred times, it becomes more and more lucidly important to remind herself that the love of a mother for a child is the most powerful of them all. Those feelings for his father are of desire and jealously and complicated retribution - mais ce n’est pas de l’amour.
She resolves that, in the morning, her and little Paul will have a grand day out. She will buy new outfits, the latest shoes, the most expensive scents. And if her husband’s brutal kiss will be the last one she receives from any quarter, then so be it.
In the meantime, she will spend his money like water. Like a good Cubist, he had somewhat boxed himself into a corner on that particular matter.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
A great story with an awkward but natural end. Feeling sorry for our woman who still loves the son of that man.
Reply
Thank you, Syed.
Reply
You paint such a beautiful scene. Your descriptions of characters and the setting is remarkably beautiful and puts you in the story with the characters. You also have such a unique voice when writing that I loved! I had never heard the backstory of Picasso, but this makes me want to learn more! Amazing job!!!
Reply
Thank you, Oliva! I really appreciate your comments.
Reply
Love this, Rebecca. Not only a fascinating story, almost compulsive in the telling, but great sentences pulled me into the MC’s lonely life. Artists can be deplorable, as well as wonderful. What a brute!!!
Reply
Thank you, Helen. I really appreciate this comment! I look forward, as ever, to your latest!
Reply
Hey Rebecca, Rather than point out all the good lines and descriptions you have here, and there are many, the best compliment I think I can give you is that you can write a story about something I would generally not care an awful lot about (Olga & Picasso) and make it very enjoyable as well as interesting to read. Lets one sort of painlessly expand their horizons, so thanks for that.
Reply
Thank you, KA. I'm not a huge fan of Picasso, (or modern art in general), but there was something about the image of Olga in the chair that stayed in my mind long after I'd read it. I was never going to be able to write a gushy romance piece, (that not being my experience at all), so Olga became the unlikely protagonist of this short story.
Thanks for commenting !
Reply
Unfortunately, I've never taken a humanities class, and was not aware of who the characters were until reading your comments, at which point, it all finally made sense. Picasso.
I had to use a dictionary for several words, (4) but they all seemed perfectly appropriate as used. More than appropriate. 'Froidure.' (Okay, I deserve a pass on that one, it's not even English. But still, the perfect word where you used it.)
This informs me that your skills are beyond my erudition to critique. So, I'll just address the story as an uninformed artistic mostly ignorant reader. (Surprisingly accurate.)
As a reader, I can stipulate that this is a ponderous tribute to two detestable (words fail me) priapic people? :)
No doubt Olga was more victim than anything else, of him and circumstances. As for the MC, I had no idea Picasso was so, mmm, eccentric. I always considered him to be a far better promotor than artist. (He was a fraud. Okay? There, I said it.) I can't fault the man, if he was a fraud in the abstract, he was a smashing success in reality.
Okay, so, it was a great story about someone I detested,
I'm kidding you. About feeling detested. (That's my best Jerry Seinfeld.) I never knew enough about Picasso to feel much either way, only that he made a lot of money off of art that required no talent. I don't think he was the first artist to become famous for crap, Wait, was this the beginning of his 'Blue' period? Oh my God. Are you shitting me? That's brilliant.
However, if you hadn't mentioned it in the comments, I might not have figured this out for months, maybe even years. Or ever. I'm no spring chicken. So, I could've died before getting the reveal of this story. I think, for dolts like me, (who like to read) you could've added some reference to his famous signature. Then again, I'm strongly opposed to writers dumbing down their prose, even for dolts.
Too much feedback, I know. But I was forced to spend an inordinate amount of time figuring out this story, so you might see this comment as a lighthearted form of payback. But please, do not question my sincerity.
Reply
Thank you, Ken. I think ... !
Reply
This story is outstanding, your writing is nothing short of remarkable. The only thing lacking here, was my ability to fully comprehend what you were doing, until after I'd finished the story.
Reply
Brilliant.
Your writing is like Jackson Pollock's paintings or the music of The Clash. I fucking love it. You are so good.
Reply
Thank you, Thomas ! The idea of it, that moment in a time when a naked woman sits in a chair for her reluctant husband, has been on my mind for some time.
As ever, I really appreciate your comment.
Reply
What a fascinating piece! I love this descrip: "The study is unkempt and suffused with the smell of paint, like snubbed tallow. "
I see this piece is tagged as creative nonfiction, so I'm trying to figure whose life you have taken a snapshot of... quite the twist at the end!
Thanks for an engaging read.
Reply
Thank you, VJ. I'll put you out of your misery by telling you the piece is about Picasso and his wife. Of course, I have put plenty of words in their mouths - but it is true that she sat for him, naked, towards the end of their marriage, and the portrait I describe was the result.
Reply
Colorful in its bleakness. Passionate in its obscenity.
You paint a magnificent picture with words.
Reply
Thank you, Geertje. I think your comment is worthy of praise in itself !
Thank you for following me.
Reply
The imagery here is as beautiful as art. Incredible work !
Reply
Thanks, Alexis. Really good of you!
I am wondering how you are going to surpass your brilliant self in romance week!
Reply
I'm working on something. (But of course !). Hopefully, it will be well-received.
Reply
It will be, I assure you.
Reply
A few unforgetable lines from this unforgetable piece:
'In the street below, teeming with Parisian decorum, the low murmur of human activity, roaming with either great purpose or with no broad intention, can be heard beneath the louder susurration of motor cars and slow hoof beat.' ~ setting us expertly in the specific time and place wherein motorcars and horse-drawn carriages shared the boulevards.
'It must be difficult, she thought, to strike the balance between the provision of good service and watchfulness.
'It is difficult to be a good wife whilst striving for the same.'
' ... the territorial ambition of his gaze.'
I could go on, but in that case one may as well just re-read the story.
I have added a new word to my list of good words: thank you for susurration!
Best,
Ari
Oh, and the final two lines are brilliant.
PS - I love the Diaghilev aspect as well. It's funny how timing sometimes works out - my last story also made reference, in a roundabout way, to Stravinski, Diaghilev's great partner in several ballet.
Reply
Thank you, Ari, for this thoughtful review.
I'll admit that I'd been somewhat dreading this inevitable romantic prompt, so it was always in the cards that I would write about a romance that didn't work out.
The image of Olga posing naked in a chair has been on my mind for some time. It seemed appropriate to bring her to life here.
Thanks again, Ari. I really appreciate your comments.
Reply